Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:GPL as transitional license (Score 1) 1098

by mwa (#46066833) Attached to: FSF's Richard Stallman Calls LLVM a 'Terrible Setback'

Sorry, but that's just bullshit. If you want to own the code, write it. Don't link to a GPL library and say "that's mine now."

And far, far more developers make in-house software, for a slary, than thw number of developers that make software to sell. They are perfectly free to use GPL software, even with their own modifications if they don't mind maintaining it, as long as they don't distribute it.

If you want to make a profit on software, don't use GPL parts. That's your choice. But don't pretend the GPL isn't protecting against hijacking by arguing that is preventing you from hijacking it.

Comment: Re:Corporate executives are smart. (Score 1) 541

by mwa (#44221579) Attached to: America's Second-largest Employer Is a Temp Agency


And the cheapest alternative is to keep the minimum wage so low that 80â of the workers get subsidized in taxpayer funded food stamps and Medicare.

The Walmart & Friends Executive Union is double dipping. They suck profits from their employees' paychecks and cut costs with taxpayers' paychecks and stick them all in their pocket because "you can't have businesses without capital."

Once you buy that, it's a simple step to accept that human health absolutely MUST be a "for profit" enterprise. If there is no profit for someone, it must not be good for any one, right?

As long as the capitalists control the conversation, the only relevant result is profit. Nothing else matters.

Comment: Re:How is cutting anything being a Democrat? (Score 4, Insightful) 519

by mwa (#41271003) Attached to: Poll-Based System Predicts U.S. Election Results For President, Senate

Allow me to translate:

  1. Screw job-creating clean energy technologies and drill, baby, drill.

  2. Gut what little worker protection we have; outsource to the lowest bidder.

  3a. Save $$ by shifting responsibility to states that we all know can't pay.

  3b. Turn education over to private companies who are only interested in
              increasing profits.

  4. Cut the programs that aid people in need but don't touch defense that
        fund megacorps and generate kick-backs.

  5. Screw clean water, clean air, safe food, safe medicine, safe work
          environments, safe vehicles, safe bridges, protection of civil rights,
          a free and open internet, private property rights* or anything else
          that might reduce profits.

The entire plan can be summarized: Maximise profits by socializing the risks
and costs. It's the Bush III plan.

* like granting unsupervised emminent domain power to a foreign corp
(TransCanada) to take land so they can move highly toxic sludge that no
one knows how to clean up (see "Enbridge") through the entire middle of our
country so they can ship it to other, foreign companies.

Comment: Re:Lucky (Score 1) 515

by mwa (#40574835) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Old Dogs vs. New Technology?

"Seriously? A new box that doesn't work right in XP? Like others have mentioned, how do you not look immediately at the BIOS?"

Because it's 2012 and buying a bunch of new boxes to put XP on makes about as much sense as committing the future of your business to COBOL running on CP/M?

Just because you can get something to work doesn't mean you should.

Comment: Re:Homebrew (Score 1) 130

by mwa (#30543202) Attached to: Helping Perl Packagers Package Perl

Perl (and Ruby and Python) already have mature packaging systems and they really don't need to interact with each other.

False. Say you have libFoo and Perl, ruby and/or python wrappers installed via their "mature packaging systems." Now, libFoo has a critical security vulnerability that requires an updated package with an API change. The system package management tool will happily upgrade the library and break the wrappers you use for production.

There is no, sane way to use multiple software management tools effectively.

Comment: Re:At least the Perl crowd is trying, (Score 5, Insightful) 130

by mwa (#30543176) Attached to: Helping Perl Packagers Package Perl

easy_install works just like CPAN. Download and install stuff so the standard distribution software management tools are now worthless for:

  1. Knowing what is installed on which production machines (basic software inventory)
  2. Reporting packages with dependencies on a package with a newly reported security issue
  3. Automatically upgrading to new releases
  4. Easily rebuilding and deploying to multiple hosts on different architectures and different releases of distros (possibly different distros)
  5. Managing dependency conflicts between different packages

and more that escape me right now because I haven't finished my coffee yet.

CPAN, easy_install and their ilk are wonderful for the developer that needs a bunch of stuff to get their application working. They are evil incarnate for the administrator that needs that application to work reliably and consistently on more that a couple of machines.

There is a huge difference between "easily installing stuff" and managing systems. The second you add anything that "works around" the standard way of doing things, whatever standard you've adopted, you've abandoned all hope of having standard operating procedures and consistent production management.

This is why systems administrators get so edgy... Every developer, user, language community, or whatever, thinks their little exception makes life easier. Exceptions don't scale.

Ok, they do scale. They evolve into chaos.


+ - Obama admin opposing copyright exception for blind-> 1

Submitted by esme
esme writes: Over at Boing Boing, there's a scoop on the Obama administration joining with other western countries to block a treaty that would create international standards for copyright exceptions for the blind and others who need technology to read. Activists at the WIPO negotiations are trying to get the word out that lobbying from publishers has caused the US, Canada, the EU, Australia, New Zealand, the Vatican and Norway to oppose the treaty.
Link to Original Source

+ - Doctors Scan Photo ID for Treatment->

Submitted by
Sherri Davidoff
Sherri Davidoff writes: "Spurred by the FTC's "Red Flags Rule," more health care clinics are requiring photo identification and storing high-resolution copies in their computer systems. Ironically, this probably puts patients at greater risk of identity theft, not less. From the article: "Walking into the doctor's office, I was surprised to see a new sign which read: 'Red Flag Identity Theft Rule: We are now required by law to ask for a Photo ID at the time of each visit. Please have your Photo ID ready for the receptionist to scan.' As an avid bicyclist, I wasn't carrying a driver's license. 'I'm sorry, we'll have to reschedule you,' said the receptionist.

"Everyone should have access to medical care- not just people who have registered with the government and obtained a photo ID. Furthermore, patients should have the right to health care without being forced to give up control of our personal information. As a patient, I don't really want a copy of my Photo ID stored on a crappy unpatched Windows box at my doctor's office. Today's patients do not even have the right to know how well doctor's offices and hospitals are secured, even in the face of constant reports of medical data breaches. That's sick.""

Link to Original Source

+ - Wallpaper upload site faces DMCA trademark claim

Submitted by
Free Culture News
Free Culture News writes: "Desktop Nexus, a wallpaper sharing site that you might recall was threatened by Toyota over user-created wallpapers a while ago, has received a trademark claim under the DMCA. Hanson Beverage Company, through the firm Continental Enterprises, sent Desktop Nexus a DMCA notice about wallpaper featuring Monster Energy Drink. After a second notification and a list of three more wallpapers flagged by the company for removal, Desktop Nexus removed the wallpapers. Before the second notice, Desktop Nexus asked for clarification on what actions the company was to take, as the original claim was not clear. The reply, which came after the removal of the wallpapers, claimed that trademark law, not copyright law, was the rationale for removal. The legality of this move is quite questionable, given that the DMCA is designed to deal with copyright infringement and not trademark infringement."