"itsh shimple, that's whuy I didn'ta understaand ert!"

Not very convincing.

That's true, but this study isn't "out of left field" at all, it's an expected result and there have been lots of studies suggesting problems with HFCS. There's also a lot of industrial propaganda that floods the space with repeated studies designed to "fail" to find a difference.

Bananas are a poor choice for an example of a "natural" food. It invites argument.

Olde English "800", of course

Clearer, but wrong.

I was just about to ask where I can get my mussel symbiote!

The Inuit have a short lifespan. They culturally disagree that heart failure resulting in death in your 50s is a disease; they consider that dying from old age. And communities will reject doctors that diagnose heart disease, other than in cases like malformed valves. Anything diet and lifestyle related they reject as a disease.

Resulting in low-information people who like to repeat what they heard thinking they're immune to heart disease, because they have a lot diagnosed rate.

Any time a population is claimed to be immune to lifestyle effects, or have results counter to other populations, check their lifespans; if they're not living longer as a result, it's always going to be an issue with diagnosis.

"It's hard to define, therefore you can't disprove me and I can say anything."

You're just trolling. You're so stupid you can't even have an argument with people.

If even Jar-jar can understand mRNA vaccines, maybe there's somebody out there who can explain to Wormdome?

If you weren't a worm-brain you'd realize you're arguing for approval, because it's not the FDA's job to decide which drugs are preferable for obtuse reasons. It's their job to evaluate them for safety and effectiveness. If it's equally effective and equally safe, then it's up to doctors to choose which to prescribe.

There is, "Underrated"

Well Dingus, there's already a bunch of AI apps people run on their phones that do this, so you might as well just throw it in the ocean and start writing letters. Or your manifesto.

It wouldn't work for "securing the future of civilization," even if they were able to overcome the mountain of difficult and expensive engineering challenges.

Any sort of calamity that put human life on Earth in peril would mean the lunar colony would stop receiving support from Earth and would die off long before the last holdouts Earthside.

There's an incredibly long list of things they'd need shipped up to survive, none of which are needed on Earth. Because on Earth you can survive by primitive means if necessary.

That's not reading, though, it's skimming.

A really weird hobby, but I guess you're probably just daydreaming and holding a book.

If you really actually are actively skimming for that much time, and not just spacing out, it really is exceptionally odd.

So if you just lift the cheesy poof fast enough, it's a life-extending workout?