I don't give a shit if some Russian/Kazakh/Malaysian bot farmer wants to take over my phone.
So you do no banking on your phone? Unlikely.
For the 99% of people that do in fact use a phone for banking, protection from lower level criminals is invaluable. For most people there is real financial loss possible from a phone being taken over, at the very least to monitor banking access mechanisms.
Let's compare, shall we?
This:
Personally, I'm on Team Tables here. Maybe in a decade or three this will be practical.
Unless Trump was the one who personally built all these models that companies are trying to replace workers with, I don't think he's much of the reason there are so many more people out of work.
I heard FAT12 had it beat for raw performance.
ChatGPT making up things and incorrectly following policy would merely be in line with the current editorial pool, who ignores policy when it suits them and fabricates material if an article has any kind of political content.
My estimate is that approximately 7 billion people are alive today who would not be alive without oil and gas.
No, SCOTUS did not rule that. They didn't need to - the word "corporation" literally means "person".
What the Citizens United ruling really said was that humans didn't lose their political and first amendment rights when they work together with other humans using a structured organization.
"Hello, Ecuadorian embassy? Yes, I heard about the weird shit with the cat, but listen..."
All this proves is that you don't know what woke means.
*smile* Heh. Ok, educate us.
Also possible. OpenAI's models do love their bullet points, and especially having exactly three examples in a list. The catchphrase "math magic" at the end also reeks of GPT-4's didactic blandishment.
Yeah, there aren't a lot of popular map projections that fail that test, unless you perhaps count the polar projection used for the UN logo. I'm guessing that sentence is there as a result of editing; perhaps it originally said equally-spaced parallels (which is true of the Robinson projection) but someone math-savvy was consulted to correct the claim to its current form (without seeing the context) and the maintainer of the page wasn't knowledgeable enough to realise it should just be removed.
What everyone does not seem to realize, is that MNAY of the choices we are making to "save the climate" are equally stupid. They are just less obviously stupid.
What does his wealth have to do with Apple's ethics or compliance with antitrust law?
Are you assuming his claim is true? He didn't get rich telling the truth. Three different AI apps have reached #1 this year. Deepseek, Perplexity, and GPT.
I made no assumptions. I simply asked a question. You went straight to class warfare and assumed he's lying, because he's rich. Maybe he is, and maybe he isn't -- if it goes to trial, the court will decide. Until then, the question stands: What does his wealth have to do with Apple's ethics or compliance with antitrust law?
When I tried opening my spreadsheets in Calc, anything that had dates in them was broken. Libre Office forces dates to follow the Libre Office locale setting, which in America is absolute garbage.
I can override any components of the default locale in Windows, and Excel uses the specifics provided by the operating system. That means that all of my spreadsheets that use sane dates (ISO 8601) work in Excel, and fail in Calc.
This has been a known problem for more than a decade, if the bug reports and forum posts I've found are accurate. The proposed workaround is to edit the locale definition and recompile the office suite.
I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour ... -- F. H. Wales (1936)
