Have you seen AI porn?

I do consider taxation theft, there is no purpose to it except for controlling the population. The fact that people accept different *levels* of theft depending on how much money they make just proves how much of theft it is, because they more money someone makes, the fewer people there are in that category of people, given that, it is easier to structure theft in such a way as to convince the majority that they don't suffer as much as the other people, who are hit with a much bigger crime.

Is animal testing just ritual sacrifice and entrail-reading?

AI DS?

What if your accuracy fetish is not shared by the majority?

What if you invested in NASDAQ?

AI says: "Volatility: Sun's stock was significantly more volatile than the general NASDAQ index, with more extreme gains during the bubble and a much steeper, more permanent crash afterward.
Long-Term Trend: While the NASDAQ Composite eventually recovered and reached new all-time highs many years later, Sun Microsystems' stock never fully recovered its peak value and the company was ultimately sold at a fraction of its peak market capitalization. "

What about a wildlife refuge, like Chernyobl turned into without humans around?

Remember when techies used to cite the slogan "only the paranoid survive"?

"Intel cofounder and former CEO Andy Grove really did say "Only the paranoid survive." It became his personal slogan and later the title of his 1996 business book "Only the Paranoid Survive"."

If you are a programmer and you are given clear instructions on what is expected, then yes. If you are a programmer and you are not given clear instructions, then no. However if you are technical lead/architect then you really should be responsible for it.

OTOH if you are a programmer and you raise these concerns then you are on your way to become a technical lead/architect.

In my systems I insist we keep a database table of various common passwords (tens of thousands of these) and we do not allow people using them as well.

What if COLAs became politically popular with people like you? Are you afraid of hurting Volcker's feelings?

Remember how inflation was not a problem for 12 years after 2008, despite mainstream economic predictions?

If inflation is noise, why not use indexation to desl with it? Are you afraid of hurting mainstream economists' feelings?

When in the history of stock markets has there not been "a big problem coming"?

If it wasn't AI, would it be something else, because investors love bubbles? And why would the Fed stand by and let another Great Depression happen when they can just act as a value buyer and end panics?

Why not include stock market gains in revenue? When Democrats call for a wealth tax, aren't they doing so?

According to Reagan should your taxes be much higher right now to pay off the debt he ran up? Why aren't they? Is your story totally unrelated to how insurance and forgiveness and can-kicking work in the actual world?

So when one of them goes off the cliff do they take all the spectators with them? Or does the Fed act as a value buyer and put a safety net under the cliff edge?