Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: macOS runs pretty much all FOSS (Score 1) 129

I have worked with both UNIX and Linux for many years and I never really got how UNIX is that much better than Linux on a laptop.

That's actually the point here. You are missing the two things. (1) Linux is a UNIX clone. (2) Most software is written for POSIX, not Linux.

This leads to so many tool chains, utilities, and applications working well under Linux, BSD, macOS, etc.

Which is the point of this thread, its title being "macOS runs pretty much all FOSS". That Windows and macOS users are not really lacking anything, in fact they have more given all the commercial software not available for Linux. Hell, the best way to run Linux "desktop linux" today is on the Windows desktop using WSL2. Linux apps and Windows apps on the same Windows desktop.

Comment Re: macOS runs pretty much all FOSS (Score 1) 129

I'm making my judgement based on pure functionality. For example, no way to traverse between uses of a variable, no way up search on all symbols, etc.

Google:

To traverse between usages of a variable in Xcode, you can use the Find Selected Symbol in Workspace command or the Related Items menu.

Method 1: Find All Usages (Symbol Search)
This is the most thorough way to see every instance where a variable is referenced across your entire project.
Right-click (or Control-click) on the variable name in the source editor.
Select Find > Find Selected Symbol in Workspace.
The Find Navigator (magnifying glass icon on the left) will open, showing a list of every file and line where that variable is used.
Click on any result in the list to jump directly to that location.

Method 2: Related Items Menu
This provides a quick way to see usages within the current file or specific callers.
Click on the variable name to place your cursor there.
Open the Related Items menu by clicking the icon at the top-left of the source editor (looks like two overlapping squares) or by pressing Control-1.
Select Callers or References to see a dropdown list of where the symbol is used.

Method 3: Highlight & Jump
Xcode automatically highlights all other instances of a variable in the current file when you click on it.
To jump between highlights: Use the keyboard shortcut Command-G (Find Next) or Command-Shift-G (Find Previous) to cycle through the matches if you have the find bar open with that text.

Method 4: Jump Bar
Click on the Jump Bar at the top of the editor window.
Click the Symbol icon (the last item in the path) to see a list of all symbols in the current file, which helps in navigating to the variable's declaration quickly.

Comment Re: macOS runs pretty much all FOSS (Score 1) 129

Linux devs gotta put food on the table and pay the bills too. The Bazaar rarely hires them for bug fixes or customization as originally theorized. The commercial Unix platforms of the engineering workstation era are gone. macOS/iOS represents the only commercially *nix environments where commercial activity gets more than a handful of developers hired.

Comment \The profession is shedding bloat (Score 1) 26

Once upon a time, there were programmers. Programmers ...

who had a genuine interest and curiosity about programming computers. Then came the internet and the big money behind it and many "programmers" were studying CS merely because it appeared a good career path, not due to innate interest in the field.

AI is helping the field of computer science shed the bloat of those with no inherent interest. Who never wrote a line of code that was not required for a class or a job. Who never learned new tech that was not required for a class or a job.

Comment Connected includes diagnostic ports (Score 1) 39

Most modern cars, including BYD, are connected.=

I'd say that connected is not exclusively wifi/cellular. Wired connections count too, and many non-modern cars have wired connection via diagnostic ports and logging data is available from these ports. Matter of fact those "classic cars" are about to start including early versions of such diagnostic ports? Or have they already?

Comment Is AI the next iteration of animated films? (Score 1) 78

I get your sentiment. I've had friends who were drama majors so I get the real work they put into it. I've been to the theatre, seen live performances of plays that have been turned into movies. They are different and both entertaining despite their differences.

One thing keeps coming to my mind, isn't an AI based film just the next iteration of animated film? Hand drawn to human directed computer graphics to AI directed computer graphics? Perhaps we can maintain the distinction between traditional film and animated film.

Comment Not our Democratic Party anymore (Score 1) 78

our democratic party

I don't think it is our Democratic Party anymore. Neither our Progressivism. Neither some of our Labor Unions. These have recently transformed into quite different things, people are very slowly recognizing this. Its hard to accept that the part of FDR and JFK is no more, its not even the party of Clinton or Obama anymore.

Comment Is AI just the modern form of animated film? (Score 1) 78

the role should have been recast. a living human should have been able to showcase their talent instead of AI ghosts.

AI might be more appropriately used in indie films? A lower barrier to entry? Maybe more for stunt scenes or otherwise expensive or dangerous things, less for regular dramatic scenes? AI just for background, location scenes, historical scenes, real actors filmed on green screen? There could be scenarios where indie projects can accomplish a lot more.

Also, it might be appropriate to have an entirely different class of film for AI. As we do with animated films. Or is AI just the modern animated film?

But I get the sentiment, for the big studio, overuse of AI would be just another reason not to go to the theatre.

Comment Floppies didn't die, they transformed - SD Cards (Score 1) 139

amazing for its time

Floppies didn't die, they transformed. Zip was not the end. Today we have SD Cards, and they are standard equipment on some systems.

And of course many would could consider USB flash drives part of that transformation. However I like to think of SD Cards first given the similar looks. :-)

Comment Re:They are likely just waiting for minesweeping (Score 1) 349

Nope. They changed their statement since I originally posted.

That's the point- they are the ones in control of the strait, not the US Navy.

Nope. They may have some influence in their costal waters. In particular around Larak Island. But that is a small portion of the straight. There is a much larger section to the south they made threats about, and that USN keeps open at this moment.

Plus, they will likely have little impact outside their coastal waters, like Larak Island, and not into the much larger area to the south the the USN says is open.

Wrong answer. They are able to project power all the way to Oman, and they already have since its re-closure.

In theory, and in an extremely limited sense, and have been warned they will lose infrastructure if they attack a ship. You confuse puffery statement with action.

Again, they just changed their statement. And gain, they are unlikely to have influence in that southern are the USN says is open.

Unlikely? They literally are. Traffic across the straight has come to a complete standstill again.

Its paywalled, by Reuters reported that ship tracking shows a dozen ships have transited the straight, in the southern region opened by the USN.

It is the reality of the situation, and the US Navy does not have the power to stop it.

This is a simple fact of asymmetric warfare.

The USN has been preparing to take on the adhoc mine layers and the adhoc speedboat gun ships for decades. And since Ukraine has been heavily investing in anti-drone systems. And there is deference. If Iran attacks a tanker the USN could do a proportionate response and sink tugboats needed to guide tankers to Iranian coastal pumping facilities. They would lose billions of dollars in income. The USN controls Iran's future and there is little to nothing they can do about that.

It requires very little for Iran to attack a ship transiting the strait, and it requires very much for the US Navy to protect them.

It takes very little to sink every commercial ship equipped for mine laying, or any gunboats that leave port. Oh, they are in an underground shelter. You collapse the exit of such facilities, the USN has been there done that.

The US Navy does not have the manpower required to escort tankers through the strait- that is why Trump tried to call for allied assistance.

Actually that was more of a minesweeping thing.

The US Navy is fully capable of intercepting drones and missiles that come close to its destroyers and cruisers- but it lacks the ability to to intercept missiles that are coming down 20-40 miles away.

They have been training to escort convoys not individual ships. And they have done so going back to the 1980s as circumstances required.

For Iran's part, they only need to marginally successfully attack a few ships for traffic to come to a halt, because there are tankers- not warships. They're not paid to run a gauntlet while people are shooting at them. As such, they have hit 3 ships in the last 24 hours, traffic has halted again, and they have re-affirmed their control over the strait, in spite of US Naval presence.

Actually the report is that they fired upon. It's not clear there were hits or real damage. Its posturing, and we'll see how the USN responds.

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTRAN rots the brain. -- John McQuillin

Working...