You just do not know yet that you _will_ give up vegetarianism! They already know.

Even regular, European-style anti-trust action done half would have nicely worked. The problem is not the methods. The problem is nothing was done when the need for action was absolutely obvious.

Oh, I am sure _you_ do not do these. Competent people do backups or redundant copies for anything that is critical, regardless of time-frame.

I know a few mathematicians. None of them are stupid. All of them can do risk management to a reasonable degree. These people from the stroy must be the dross.

Yes. And that case is covered in all _basic_ BCM materials. You do not only need backup for data. You also need backups for roles.

Well, either you can trust people to not lose their keys, or you cannot. In the second case, you need some redundancy. But sure, the screw-up also included them apparently trusting incompetents too much.

Indeed. Probably some more big-ego-small-skill people managed to make it in there.

Sad but true.

Not nearly as irritating as having dozens of random dot subdirectories in the root of your home directory.

The first issue costs a few developers a few days of their time to fix. The second is a problem that nags millions of users for eternity.

Indeed.

If you have a working market, product quality matters. The while disaster that is Microsoft is also a good example for a market failure. At fault is the US that never managed to do any meaningful anti-trust action against MS when it would still have accomplished something.

How repulsive.

"No backup" is amateur-level. Also that they did not use n-out-of-k with n k is a pretty basic mistake.

Because at this rate, by my math, the number of AI cores Google requires will exceed the number of atoms in the visible universe within about 120 years.

Quite true. Unfortunately, MS crap is also a really good example for a market failure.