Comment Re:buying stuff with ChatGPT? (Score 1) 21
I bought a nice pair of gloves this year with ChatGPT, but when they arrived I found that they each had six fingers.
I bought a nice pair of gloves this year with ChatGPT, but when they arrived I found that they each had six fingers.
Whatever happened to IPv6 ?
I didn't do anything crazy like actually read the article, but I did go as far as to read the third sentence of the summary, which began like this:
[A]round half of internet traffic continues to use IPv4, because changing to IPv6 can be expensive and complex [...]
.... and that would seem to indicate that IPv6 is currently handling around half of Internet traffic.
If you read again what I wrote, I was commenting in the need to take crap, not the willingness. It is a difference and a rather big one.
Well, I can see that you never made that experience. I have.
Stop chasing these false "scarcities" that continue to crop up from time to time. Build your systems with used or NOS parts that are 3 or more generations back.
That's good advice for individuals building a home system for personal use. It's not really applicable for businesses and companies, though, since they likely don't have the expertise or the man-hours required to cobble together their business-critical systems from used parts. They're going to want to buy new, from a company that give them good support if/when anything goes wrong.
The [AI] infrastructure isn't going to get shut down and sold off it's going to get used.
It'll get used, if using it is more profitable than letting it go dark. Given the infrastructure costs of keeping all that hardware running, it's not a given that it will be. Once the investor $$$ stop flowing and the debt limits are hit, we'll see how much of the AI hardware build-out can really pay for its own room and board, and how much was just 'peacock feathers' whose only real purpose was to impress gullible investors into handing over their money.
Indeed. People with a good education have _options_. And that means they do not have to take crap. Obviously, quite a few assholes do not like to have that type of person around.
It really depends. As degrees in the US are a big business, there are many worthless degrees and many that you can get easily, making them worthless if you did it the easy way.
Funny thing. The largest private (i.e. for profit) University in Germany currently has problems because many students find the degrees are not valuable and they do not learn a lot. No such problems with the regular ones. I think commercial education is just broken because of perverted incentives.
Getting a degree does not absolve you from really learning and being good at things. I think a significant pert of the people with degrees that have trouble finding jobs did select "easy" ones or took it wayyyy to easy getting them. Commercial "education" will make that easy, but you waste your time and money that way.
Because people without degrees are often just envious.
I routinely ask my part-time students why they chose to get that degree after all. It is "need more skills for my job", "no career options without that degree" and sometimes "I really want to know more about things". This mostly students that are interested in IT security though, no idea how representative that is.
Ah, so "stupid" is what you are going for. Gotcha.
Have a look at history. I recommend the French revolution, in particular. Point is, you can keep people in poverty, but putting them there is something that rarely works on mass-scale. If it has ever worked at all.
It's kind of a suprising to me that it was a fungus and not a plant that developed this ability. After all, plants already feed on elecromagnetic radiation.
The chlorophyll in plants is finely tuned to absorb specific wavelengths of light. It already has a hard time with green light compared to blue light, and it's simply not going to work at all with radiation that has wavelengths that are orders of magnitude shorter. Chlorophyll acts like a little antenna that gets excited by certain light frequencies, but ionizing radiation would just blow the chlorophyll molecules apart and destroy them.
Taking advantage ionizing radiation is going to require a completely different mechanism than plant photosynthesis, just like you can't use glass lenses or parabolic mirrors to focus X rays or gamma rays. Plants probably have no more chance of having such a mechanism than fungi do.
Do you think about what you write or do you just regurgitate all slop that comes to your mind?
Funny, how you use cheap manipulation techniques in your answer. Makes me think you have absolutely nothing except a big ego.
You have a message from the operator.