The chlorophyll in plants is finely tuned to absorb specific wavelengths of light. It already has a hard time with green light compared to blue light, and it's simply not going to work at all with radiation that has wavelengths that are orders of magnitude shorter. Chlorophyll acts like a little antenna that gets excited by certain light frequencies, but ionizing radiation would just blow the chlorophyll molecules apart and destroy them.

Taking advantage ionizing radiation is going to require a completely different mechanism than plant photosynthesis, just like you can't use glass lenses or parabolic mirrors to focus X rays or gamma rays. Plants probably have no more chance of having such a mechanism than fungi do.

Do you think about what you write or do you just regurgitate all slop that comes to your mind?

Funny, how you use cheap manipulation techniques in your answer. Makes me think you have absolutely nothing except a big ego.

That will not work.

Are you being serious? I cannot tell. Stupid has been the name of the game too often recently.

Indeed. Hallucinations cannot be "turned off" in an LLM. At the same time, an LLM is not an intelligence with any reasonable definition of the term. It is also completely unsuitable to be used as an "agent", unless occasional completely wrong actions and a high level of vulnerability to attacks are not a problem. I do not see any practical scenarios where that would be the case, except as support for attackers. Attackers do not care if a high number of attack fail, they only care that some succeed.

"Nah" and "can do it at least for a straightforward question" do not go together here.

Incidentally, I was also commenting on the math aspect. You are obviously mentally deficient and only see the keywords that you want to see in a text.

Friend of mine is a professor of robotics. He thinks the only thing that makes a regular industrial robot safe is a safe distance. Now add an LLM to the mix.

Installed Boeing blots are actually fine. Usually. The problem is with not installing Boeing bolts.

Indeed. Only one of the two major civilian airplane makers is not ok with blood on their hands.

This is actually pretty old. There are no working safeguards in place. Maybe when the current AI hype crashes half of the world economy when it ends, we may get those safeguards. Or not.

No. The "problem" that LLMs are pushed as "being able to solve" is wages.

First, wages are not actually a problem. If you want a market, people need to be able to buy products. Second, LLMs have so far proven incapable and incompetent in anything that would have been a real killer. They will continue to do so.

Hence we will get (if the manage to bring down the cost massively, which is a big if) somewhat better search that occasionally returns total crap, cheap generation of low quality graphics and music and, maybe, some specialist LLMs that solve some actual problems, but nothing earth-shattering.

We can stop right there, because that is not happening anytime soon and LLMs will NOT be the way there if it ever happens.

Including some "redefinitions" of AGI. Stupid assholes with lots of money.

Indeed. For some reason the idea of slaves (whether humans or machines) also sells really well to some people of low/negative worth as persons, some with tons of money.