It's important, they say, to write with clear structure, to announce your intentions, and especially to include as many formatted sections and headings as you can. In other words, to get ChatGPT to pay attention, you must write more like ChatGPT.
So
I bet he jacks off writing that.
"He does this, he says, because he wants to boost his influence over the world, because he wants to help teach the AIs about things he cares about"
It takes a real narcissist to think your writing is going to teach AI's anything. Apparently he doesn't realize there's a million SuperKendalls for every one of him and AI can't tell the difference. That or he's one of those SuperKendalls.
It's the data scientists who decide what AI's learn from, and they don't really give a shit.
"...neurodiverse workers were 25% more satisfied with AI assistants and were more likely to recommend the tool..."
You know who else would be more satisfied? Stupid people. Chimpanzees would find AI unimaginably great.
And that's not a knock on "neurodiverse workers", it's a knock on the "study". In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. What matters is what the "tool" can do, not what the deficiencies of some users are.
The kinds of foods that trash your LDL predate the FDA and the United States.
Groups are the only reason I use Facebook anymore.
No, I have no desire to see which hyperventilating cause my aunt is re-posting something about today. But all the groups that used to have their own discussion boards on their own blog sites have moved to Facebook.
Took this far to find a comment about the topic rather than a personal attack on the reporter.
MAGA life.
As many have discovered, it isn't perfect - with no guarantee the code will actually work or be free of bugs.
So very unlike human generated code, which by contrast is always free of bugs, always perfectly implementing the spec, right out of the box, and with no QA needed!
there are 5 billion Roblox accounts created
5 billion more accounts than you have brain cells, apparently
.... then blame the shoplifters. And their enablers ("stores have insurance, what's the big deal?").
Trust me, stores don't want to have to do stuff like this.
The homeless people by me all waiting for government funded homing, none get a dime from any charity ?
Wow, really? The city near me has a Christian rescue mission that helps tons of homeless people. And that's all charity.
They do way better than any government does about the problem.
As many as 30 students might have enrolled, according to observations from neighbors.
I believe the cool kids at the time were calling that a "pod".
There were mixed reactions to them, but I guess this one was extra evil because Zuckerberg oh noes
... Democrats had better get off their rears and vote to fund it. And give on the filibuster.
You do know that's the holdup, right?
I think we all know nothing good ever came from that place.
"...the goal is to facilitate rapid infrastructure buildouts without raising residential electricity rates."
If infrastructure buildouts are needed to power AI why is it merely a "goal" to avoid raising residential electric rates? Why should the society pay even a penny for electric wastefully consumed by billionaire's companies?
The universe is like a safe to which there is a combination -- but the combination is locked up in the safe. -- Peter DeVries
