And nobody can afford these things anymore and idiots like this one need to scramble to undo their bad ideas.

I hope these kids remember the assholes behind this when they become old enough to vote.

Hahahaha, not. You cannot get away with selling slopmakers long-term.

Well, better late than never.

It is legal to do so in the EU, BUT you must make the full process that generated that price transparent and you must state that it is a personalized price:
https://europa.eu/youreurope/c...

I guess that pretty much kills the idea in the EU as it relies of customers not knowing. Anyways, have fun with your anti-consumer version of capitalism! So much winning! Just not for you...

I care about the kids, and I don't think this is treading on them, I think it's pushing them to have IRL relationships, and that's a good thing. I say that as a nerd who had few friends when I was a teen (in the 80s), but even normal, social kids today have far fewer real friendships and many of the geeky kids like I was now have none at all.

We're a social species, we need and crave socialization, but social media is to real relationships like drugs are to the normal joys of life; a false but massively-amped substitute for the real thing, addictive and harmful. It's perfectly possible to get high or drunk from time to time and still enjoy real life, but you have to use the artificial happiness in moderation and control. There are really good reasons why we try to keep kids away from drugs and alcohol, and keep adults away from the really powerful and addictive stuff, and get them into treatment when they get hooked (well, in the US we mostly just put them in prison, but some parts of the world are getting smarter and focusing on treatment).

The same logic applies to social media. We need to figure out how to tame its effects on adults, especially those who are for some reason especially vulnerable and get very warped by it. IMO, it makes perfect sense to just try to keep kids off of it entirely, especially since we don't really understand it yet.

True. If we were to make the decision based on medical and scientific bases, the drinking age would be 25.

You are projecting. How stupid.

Hahaha, no. Full regulation would work nicely. I guess you have no idea how tightly the non-crapto part of finances is regulated.

Indeed. Just using AI to generate statements is already satire.

That sounds stupid. Must be some political thing.

Indeed. And the font color has to be gold.

Serifs are _only_ for ease of reading if your printing technology is not very good. As soon as you do not have that problem, sans-serif fonts are significantly superior.

It is well known to experts that fonts without serifs are better readable as long as the display tech is good, such as in modern monitors and modern printers. Serifs serve to increase readability when the display tech is not so good, such as in old printing technology.

Once again a Trump admin member outs himself as a blithering idiot. No surprise.

I am mainly commenting on not very smart people regarding "pie in the sky" news as "we will have this soon". If you do not like that, stop reading my posts?