Give popular science a big miss, they are weird ass copyright freaks, articles not available in other countries, articles deleted at random intervals etc. Just give them a big miss and go somewhere else and never ever link to them, really rather pointless to attempt to do so.
The link was pop-sci Australia. I'm in Australia, can read all the other articles, but it says that one isn't there. Strange. It was however while reading my first article on the main page that I realised that I didn't want to bother with any more...
Or to put it another way, if someone feels the need to say "XYZ is settled science" that's a clue that it might not be.
"Their definition makes it legal to look down shirts as well as up skirt"
As a 6' tall Resident of Massachusetts, I'm very glad to hear that. I very often find myself looking down shirts despite having no intention to do so, because I am otherwise unable to look at many women at all from normal conversational ranges. If they had made it illegal for me to speak to women, that would have sucked. I actually can't make it through most days without doing that at least once.
I predicted you would not give evidence.
You did not give evidence.
Given that you do not provide evidence, it is likely you have none.
Which part do you incorrectly think is a lie?