Even when it's true, trying to deflect blame by publicly blaming the victim is usually a very bad idea. Their PR department was either asleep, not consulted, or vetoed.

"compared to entry-level electrical engineering" should be "compared to recent graduates with electrical engineering degrees doing relevant entry-level work"

Proofreading the rest of my post above is left as an excercise to the apprentice AI proofreader created 5 years from now.

"Low skilled" is relative: As far as "trades being low-skilled" it may be that apprentice-level electricians (on the way to becoming a Master Electrician) are low-skilled compared to entry-level electrical engineering (on the way to becoming a Professional Engineer). Even your average PE electrical engineer is "low-skilled" compared to somebody. Likewise, your apprentice engineer is "high skilled" compared to the same person when they were 16 and flipping burgers or sweeping floors.

Proofreading for common things like spelling, grammar, and style-guide compliance is something I see AIs becoming very good at in the next 5-10 years if not sooner. Even pre-AI spell-check and grammar-check was usually better than nothing, provided you took it as "a suggestion" rather than "the computer is all-knowing." But even a good 2030-era AI proofreader will have difficulty (flagging "errors" that aren't) if your writing style is not what it considers "correct."

AI-assistants that direct people how to do things like indoor wiring and plumbing may cut down on trades, provided the legal landscape allows it. AI assistants can also help an advanced apprentice-or-higher level person do some work that is more advanced than his level would indicate. But then again, so can having an expert co-worker standing over your shoulder as you ask him questions.

But any time you've got a situation where "if things go south DURING the job, bad things happen" you want an expert there who can react faster than an AI-bot can tell a less experienced person "STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND TURN THAT KNOB CLOCKWISE 1/4 TURN RIGHT NOW OR YOU WILL HAVE AN EXPLOSION."

In other words, I don't think you'll have a huge loss of trades workers because of AI. Some reshuffling and some loss, maybe, but not a huge lost.

Robot machine operators that can operate machines with no people around or in other situations where a "bad event" may destroy equipment but not hurt or kill anyone may be good candidates for robots.

Administrative roles that pretty much operate on a "checklist" or "do it by the book" are candidates for automation, but be careful here: Some of these "do it by the book" roles are intended to do things like catch fraud. For these roles you want people who can "do it by the book" but who have a "spidey sense" to detect when someone is trying to "do the paperwork just right to get past the AI-robo-administrator" but who is in fact trying to do something bad, like steal money.

How about 2^30 seconds?

You can kill explorer.exe if you don't want a desktop.

Paper tapes from the 1750s are still readable if they were stored properly. Finding looms from that era are a different matter (but you could make a modern reproduction).

That's what the hippies said in the '60s, or so I've heard.

>Do you want Reavers?

You do realize some villiage's idiot out there is saying "Yes, please."

>A "Master Race" thing is being set up in the young

Will it be humans? Computers/AI? Aliens? Dolphins?

I'm hoping it will be us humans, but I hear the smart money is on the dolphins. At least they will be smart enough to leave this blue marble.

CowboyNeal wants me to do.

Well, perhaps we need to look at not really open hardware and software. We also need to be careful of the influencers.

There are probably people still using the same land line handsets that were installed 100+ years ago.*

* granted, the rotary-dial part may or may not work depending on your phone company, but a touch-tone phone from the 1960s works fine on most POTS land-lines or on VOIP with the right adapter or modem.

At least the professor in that movie had to think up his own lecture material.

With AI, not so much.

On the other hand, that teacher was limited by what he could fit in his own head.

In a few decades (or a few years?) a well-trained AI that has literally been trained in every important-and-still-relevant publication on the topic will be able to write a top-notch college-freshman-level lecture on topics that aren't rapidly evolving.

We need an AI checkbox for investors!