Excuse me sir, but I could not help heartily agreeing with the veracity of your statement and wondering just why it was your signature for at least that post is not "Ha Ha!".
I agree it would have been really illuminating to do the same test for a large range of free iOS apps.
However I think that you wouldn't see the most egregious of tracking stuff going on in iOS, for two reasons:
1) iOS reviews would I think alarm on something connecting to 810 different tracking sites. Definitely f you were trying to do anything like that in the background.
2) There's simply not as much data to gather. Most Android apps ask for all possible permissions, because why not? You're probably not going to read it anyway. With the iOS permissions as they are the user is going to think "why is this app which has nothing to do with contacts, asking for contacts" (or location, or photo library, or health data, etc).
That said I'm sure many free apps on iOS are doing everything they can possibly get away with, and I would love to see quantified just what that is.
I guess you saw what I did there, but didn't appreciate it.
The EmDrive uses a sealed cavity. There's nowhere for any propellant to come out, even if there were any!
sure, the only thing it could do if it remained sealed would be emit black body radiation, and the whole reason this report is interesting is that it's apparently moving a lot more than you'd get from such a result. well, perhaps it could offgas, that's been mentioned elsewhere.
I totally understand what you're saying, and I agree entirely, except when it comes to conservation of momentum. It's a simple concept that is necessary for this Universe to make any sense and be stable in any way.
Not really. There may be well-defined circumstances in which it can be violated, which rarely occur in the "natural" order of things. In theory, planets can make their own functional electronic circuits through ordinary volcanic and geologic processes, in practice... 42, I guess. It has long been observed that the laws of physics seem to break down at very high and very low energy states. If they behave themselves at most other times, then most things will behave in a way that is highly predictable at most times.
If it were pushing against some hitherto unknown particle, that would possibly be even MORE dramatic
On the other hand, this could be a new interaction with an existing particle. How dramatic would that be? Can you rank it on the scale of 0 to Telemundo?
and there's no matching GTK theme
Does gtk-qt-engne still work? (QGtkStyle, which goes the other way, is part of Qt.)
On the other hand, it looks like people are finally getting bored discussing it. So even if Ubuntu is getting worse, the Slashdot discussions are getting better!
There's little point discussing it once it has already happened, unless you enjoy flagellation of deceased equines.
You don't, by chance, write for the UNIX Fortune program, do you?
This is your chance to get something back from Carly. She will never ever ever ever win, so you can get your piece of what she's liberated from the users in the form of bonuses by working for her campaign.
Don't feel bad, so did a moderator.
An honest question - what is different about G+'s interface or paradigm (compared to Facebook) that gets people to post content that makes you like them more?
I'm not really sure. Somehow G+ seems more oriented towards seeing stuff from disparate sources. I just find more stuff to reshare.
You know what motivates scientists? Science. And to a lesser extent, their ego.
It's amazing how all of these pure Beings of Science can exist without any sources of funding, or motivation deriving thereof...
Science if hard work for little pay
Little > 0
I'll let you have the last response. Just thought someone should, in the name of scientific accuracy, throw actual truth into the froth.
Oh, one last truth...
Now, with the benefit of hindsight, it's clear that the phrase "liberal media" was a conservative talking point
I would say to draw your own conclusions from that glaring fact but you already have, and you got them wrong.
One does not simply fly into Mordor.
For instance, if I wanted to cite a verse about gambling and alcohol, I could say please see Chapter 2, verse 19 or (quran 2:19) on gambling and alcohol:
Of course many Muslim traditions interpret the text differently (I think sufis believe inner experience is more important), but what your crossdressing, necrophilia fantasies warrant proper source citing.