If these co pansies do not want cancelling to be as easy as signing up, then let’s not have the rule. Instead, let’s have a rule that signing up should be as difficult as cancelling. Any company with difficult cancellations that is too easy to sign up to should be heavily penalized.

Yeah. I think that’ll do it.

If they're serious, they'll have a dead tree newsletter version of the website people can get snail-mailed to their door.

There's a joke in here somewhere... :D

Ironically, most other first world countries are policed "by consent," and consider the US to be policed "by force."

No, but the NSA will use high-pressure sales tactics to sell you freedom.

Cos that's what they're selling.

No, really!

Stop laughing!

Merchantability is only one element of that two pronged fork. Fitness for purpose is the second. They cannot disclaim fitness for purpose or subsequently render the item unfit for purpose unless that condition was stated prior to sale.

I'd like to see an environmental impact study. The Van Allen radiation belt is still all pumped up from 60's nuke testing. Getting to Mars in half the time is nice'n'all, but if that also means a DOS attack on satellites and manned spaceflight in general, is it worth it?

Mars is worth the wait.

Apple doesn't allow others to have their own stores. Apple isn't just controlling their store, but are also suppressing other stores.

It's all about atomic distancing, these days.

The year 2000 called and wants its headline back ;)

I have one. Since they "fixed" it, it gets 32mpg instead of 41mpg actual. I'm more worried about CO2 and am happy to burn 3x more DEF to keep the other emissions down. DEF is cheap. Give me back my power and economy.

Honestly, if we can't solve the problem of nag screens on car radios telling us not to use them when moving EVERY SINGLE TIME WE START THE CAR then solving a beeper problem in a hospital might be a bit beyond us.