One reason for quarterly reporting is that it gives greater transparency and insight into how a business actually works. Many businesses are seasonal. Most obviously, virtually all retail has its best quarter at the end of the calendar year. But many other types of businesses have key cycles each year that are tied to, for example, the buying habits of their largest customers. Suppliers matter, too; if farms have a bad quarter due to weather or other factors, for example, you're going to want to watch how that impacts food producers somewhere down the line.

If I knew that, I'd be a tech billionaire inventing them.

The best part of innovations is that they are NOT obvious, but once they are in the world, you can't do without.

Quite so. It's been how many years since something really new came out of Cupertino? Granted, Apple is more profitable than ever, but the company clearly shows what the result of placing a supply-chain expert as the CEO does.

The really sad part is that there's nobody ELSE, either. Microsoft hasn't invented anything ever, Facebook and Google are busy selling our personal data to advertisers, and who else is there who can risk a billion on an innovation that may or may not work out?

That's wrong. I stopped using wrist watches 25 years ago and haven't looked back a single day. I don't want shit on my wrist. Try living without for a year and you'll realize why. It's hard to express in words. It's like having a chain removed.

Headphones, on the other hand, I use occasionally. For phone calls or for music on the train, plane, etc. - and especially for the plane if the noise cancellation comes close to my current over-the-ear Bose I'd take them on the two-day business trips where I travel with hand luggage only and space is a premium.

Do I want a heartbeat sensor? No idea. I don't care. But if there's any use for it than at least for me that's not a replication. I'm pretty sure many, many Apple users don't have a smart watch.

Let's start with math.

I sampled all the questions marked hard.
I felt the questions were often obscurities for no valuable reason. It was as though they wanted to test reading comprehension rather than mathematics. As a dyslexic, I disapprove of this.
That said, there were no questions on the exam at any level that were more difficult than "sorta trivial". I think Khan Academy (I've watched every math video on the site as of 2021) covers every topic on the exam by 9th or 10th grade math.

Reading

Oh holy hell. I started by reading an essay... Nay... A diatribe on the importance of communicating clearly through simple wording. The author mastered the art of the 10 word run on sentence (feels as though it will never end) and perfected wording their sentences in the most technically proper but naturally uncomfortable forms. The author conveyed all their points in the first page or so and then used substantially more text to annoy the reader with absolutely unnecessary and uninteresting examples. The author should read Plato and Cicero on rhetoric as they have absolutely no knowledge of it themselves.

I can honestly say that I grew so bored of the writing that eventually started skipping a bit.

The questions were ugly. I'd like to believe I am skilled at these types of exams. But in the case of multiple choice questions, there were often intentionally ambiguous choices.... and I felt this was true for even the basic questions.

I've taken similar national exams in 5 different languages. (Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Spanish, Italian). I faired poorly on Swedish and Italian because I understand them only due to their similarities to other languages.

The other countries had much harder math exams but that's not unusual because at least Scandinavian countries don't teach math. They teach math exam tricks to a very advanced level.

Reading exams in other countries are much better. The texts are much less pretentious and favor vocabulary common people would actually employ. Not like the author I mentioned earlier who I guess hero worshipped Chaucer.

The one notable exception I've encountered is the Norwegian B2 language exam. As someone comfortable reading university research papers written in varying degrees of Norwegian complexity the wording employed on the Norwegian B2 reading exam, a test of whether you can communicate without you peers having to change how they communicate in order to facilitate you, I encountered entire essays where I couldn't even guess what they meant. I believe this was because rather the author of those essays didn't respect the spirit or intent of the exam, a test of a person's ability to communicate and function in real world environments, they made it an academic test which tested syntax and semantics.

In summary, I wouldn't be concerned by the reading scores. I feel strongly this is a reflection upon the authors of that topic of the exam. I would be concerned by the mathematics. The exam was trivial. I've felt strongly for some time that math should be entirely self paced. Classrooms destroy mathematics. If you miss one topic you may as well just stop or retake the entire year. Teachers should focus on grading whether students learned the topic in math or if they memorized the patterns.

P.S. As a point of interest, I have evaluated many adults who scored with top grades all through school but never learned math. When a person learns math, there is no memorization involved. If you understand it, you can figure it out. "Top achievers" memorize and regurgitate. When they feel as though the information no longer holds value, they forget it.

So he claims that social media - the platform where everyone pretends to be more happy, more active, better looking, more interesting, more travelled, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, - feels "fake" ?

Man.

Next he's going to say that artificial sweeteners taste might not be natural.

Seriously, though, social media has been the domain of bots for at least a decade. Even people who actually write their posts themselves use bots to cross-post to all the different platforms and at "optimal" times. Nothing on social media is not fake. Well, maybe your grandmother's photo album because she doesn't know Photoshop exists.

Do you want to bet on the percentage of Fortune 500 companies that use amateur-level procedures for their prod systems?

"Above 50%" seems like a guaranteed win to me.
"Above 75%" is where I start to think "maybe not that high". But I fear I'm giving them too much credit.

It is impossible to do now that half of what we have always considered clear indicators of a scam or phishing attempt are actually being done by actual companies.

But the "m" in npm always stood for "malware", did it not?

The npm ecosystem is deeply flawed. Look at some of the affected repositories. Many of them are just a few lines of code, yet over a hundred other packages depend on them. At least half of them have no reason to even exist. A lot of them have last been updated years ago.

We have an ecosystem where seemingly every individual function has its own package. That is just ridiculous. It is modularization driven to its absurd extreme. It's why you add one package to your project and it pulls in a hundred dependencies.

And the more tiny packages there are, the larger the attack surface and the smaller the amount that can be monitored for malware injection and other problems. I wouldn't at all be surprised if one or more of these packages will never be updated and have the malware in them forever simply because the only dev with the password to the repo has since died or gone to do other things with his life.

Back to naive (probably American too), every time people are asked to face realities that make them uncomfortable, they accuse people of ludicrous nonsense like siding with maga or some other nonsense like believing in Bill Gates conspiracies.

I'm working myself to build an app and/or standardize API to link health monitoring data acquired from phones and wearables into federal medical databases for civilized countries where people are lucky enough to have governments who actually care about the welfare of their people. It's an opt-in service allowing people to choose to provide invasive data to their doctors including even GPS tracking data. So, if you get poisoned it could be useful to know where you've been to identify the poison and prevent others.

I also work with nanotech. We are experimenting with electronics that can gather data when passing through you.

Do you feel it's difficult to believe that these technologies may eventually converge? Or that it may even reach the point where these sensors a use in water management for troubleshooting the network but are seen to have health benefits? Imagine if we could produce nanotech indicators and phone sensors that would allow tracking all public water through the network, people's bodies and waste management. Each indicator would transmit nothing but a serial number. This would be so insanely useful. Airbags for water. I'll chat with my boss about it. I'd bet he could get funding for that.

And for the toilet robots. No we don't. For the sake of brevity and avoiding macroeconomics, the toilet robot is an incredible ROI. Need proof? Look at Japanese toilet seats. Toilet paper is surely cheaper.

The robot flushing would also clean. This is long overdue. Transgenderism alone has forced the need for effective methods of maintaining unisex toilet stalls. Robots will facilitate this. You finish and exit the stall and a robot rolls in to flush and clean. Same for the sinks. Men in general require great assistance sticking things in holes. Paper towels land next to the bin, toilet paper on the floor, tinkles everywhere. The smell issue too.

There are human assisted AI droids coming to the bathrooms. I'd bet your soul on it.

The number of developers capable of clearly expressing their requirements is small.

I posit that the greatest gains are achieved by the most coherent communicators.

I have seen massive gains from using AI. I turn on the microphone and dictate what I want. I break tasks into small achievable tasks with clearly defined goals and strict testing requirements. I make the AI commit changes to git and monitor the CI/CD pipeline. I constantly review code and train the models (I generally use three in parallel and choose the best result) to produce the code and comments I prefer.

But it takes time and effort to learn the tools

Kids like my daughter are obsessed with learning. They avoid AI because they'd rather get a lower grade but learn the topics. Other kids want top grades but figure they can learn it later if they choose.

I never look at grades when evaluating CVs. I look at github

There's your prob.

Mark of Meta doesn't "submit complaints". One of his aides calls the office directly and orders them to take the page down and make sure it stays down.

It's a completely different channel.

War is the failure of politics, not the continuation.

We have all but removed them already. In many kills these days, a human presses a button and that's about it.

But yes, removing them entirely removes that last bit of accountability. Next time a drone slaughters a market place full of civilians with no terrorist anywhere in sight, we won't even have someone to put on trial.

Well, we can try with the LLM making the decision. I'm sure it'll apologize a lot and invent a number of threats to justify its actions, if current AI is any indication.