Comment Re:Betteridge says... (Score 1) 27
Betteridge says no.
I used to think like you until I read the headline, "Is Betteridge's Law of Headlines Correct?"
Betteridge says no.
I used to think like you until I read the headline, "Is Betteridge's Law of Headlines Correct?"
It used to be that when we set up an experiment we'll have a dependent variable (the effects on cultivation) and an independent variable (the ionizing radiation dose) and when we "studied" the second we'd also track the first.
You have a misconception about the experiment. The point wasn't to study the fungus itself but rather the point of the experiment was to see if and how much it would attenuate cosmic radiation.
I'd like to know what left-wing racism is. Curious, not important since both are not actually real things.
This is online; I hardly went out but stores and traffic looked almost dead. Plus we might get stats later on the return rates... AI helping buy stuff people didn't really want.
Even if AI makes shopping better; it won't for long. It's not so great NOW and the enshitification of it has barely even begun. I only hear of initial deals to increase engagement and integrate marketing - they've got to make actual money at some point even though it may never pay for itself at the rate they are spending.
Perhaps the most interesting part is that the AI only needs to learn enough to fool INVESTORS which is a far lower bar than any actual intelligence.
China is building a maglev line between Beijing and Shanghai, which will then extend south. Given how fast they build conventional high speed rail, I expect that expansion will be rapid.
It's an interesting design too, and a largely domestic one. They do have a German built maglev in Shanghai, but the new EMUs they have been showing off bare little resemblance beyond using electromagnetic suspension. I'm looking forward to comparing it to Japan's electrodynamic suspension.
Try looking into STEM jobs vs those with degrees. The difference is massive. We simply do not have enough STEM jobs and that was before the push for STEM... which was a gamble on technology shaking up the future economy. There are not enough jobs to go around; just as before when there was nowhere near enough farm jobs for the number of people. Industrialization made farming too productive but it also created demand for new labor. This is not the case today. Even if there was, you'd need enough consumer demand to drive it and there simply isn't enough in large part because we have resource limits - you can't have everybody consuming at USA levels without 5+ more earths.
Those "public" universities have to fight like hell to keep funding just so they can be "public" which in some states is lucky to be 40% funded! Now is that really public when 60% is not publicly funded? It used to be more which is just one reason why costs have gone up. They also do not spend 30+% of the budget in marketing like private schools do which lowers costs. Sadly, if the state football team does well, then funding can go up but then a lot of it still is wasted on sports! Furthermore, I don't think bending the rules so a meathead can play for the team really helps.
College used to be elite. Just flunking out was prestigious; because not many could even be accepted. Now anybody can go and it's turned almost into high school; if you are connected, you can be a moron and graduate. History major? No matter, you survived it and therefore are probably worth hiring plus you have a broad general understanding of the world, can think, innovate, and teach yourself. The degree is not supposed to be job skill training. Trade schools do that.
I'm in the system. I've seen it degrade slowly over time. COVID damage continues.
Plus there are the private school scams and loan system which create a lot of the trouble. I remember my friend went to a fancy expensive school and racked up a house worth of debt... his school required the ID also be a credit card! He maxed that thing out right away!
High school used to not be a mandatory universal socialized program like it is today. Society advanced and countries with a chance at the future funded socialized high school. Now society is MORE complex than ever and it is again is time to extend high school by 2 years; with a delay for military service for the kids who mature slowly (no you actually don't learn job skills in the service; those are outliers.) Actually public service in general should be a promoted option for 16-24 year olds.
I've noticed the racists came out from hiding when Trump was in. Some are even more depraved now. It doesn't have to be a fictional character to work; as cartoonist as he is, this shit is as real as his diapers.
But how are the tariffs limiting the manufacturing supply capacity of RAM factories in East Asia?
Do you have a mechanism to propose?
Do you think they're making enough to meet demand but then blaming tariffs to justify jacking up prices? All of them? It would be an interesting conspiracy but is there any evidence to support that theory?
Tariffs will cause manufacturers to divert supply to countries that have the lowest tariffs on their product exports. This is what Canada is doing in any way they can including (as of this week) the construction an oil pipeline to the Pacific to serve Asian nations.
This will reduce the supply of their products to nations with the highest tariffs. This also provides them with better market certainty, than a nation that breaks existing trade agreements on a whim (like a commercial accurately quoting Ronald Reagan) to raise tariffs at the whim of a single individual.
If you trade with the US there is no certainty for any nation in how much their previously popular products will be penalized or the when or for what reason.
Manufacturers want reasonably predictable sales volumes with trading partners with trade agreements that will be kept. Otherwise, they will find such partners elsewhere.
Thus the US likely now ranks lower than any other trading partner *if* not absolutely necessary move existing product. And if a manufacturer is dependent on US imports, they are looking for new trading partners that provide stability as they reduce exports to the US.
This is basic human relations and economics. You only work with someone who bullies you and does not keep their agreements if you absolutely have to.
And the rest of the world does not. They just need time to re-align to working together and cutting the unreliable US out of their critical export planning.
The US is now the trading partner you want to get away from (like Canada is working on) if you can.
Foreign made products that have import tariffs higher than the worldwide average will reduce shipments if their manufacturers are able. This will increase US domestic prices for their products and create shortages as those foreign manufacturers move their exports to more friendly markets.
While US importers and distributors will increase the prices of such imported products for all consumers whether US manufacturers or individual consumers.
The reasons for not travelling seem questionable though, and you could argue that it wouldn't be safe for Indian staff to travel to the US.
Never tell people how to do things. Tell them WHAT to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity. -- Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.