Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
User Journal

Journal bethanie's Journal: Supah Freak 48

I got one! Of course, this guy looks like he foes just about anyone who has an opinion that doesn't amount to a concurrence with his opinion -- to acknowledge his existence is to become his enemy. And I did fuck around with him a little bit. But still. What a pussy!

Buhahahahaha! I feel SOOOOO deliciously eeeeeevil!! I got one!

I GOOOOOOT OOOOOONE!
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Supah Freak

Comments Filter:
  • Look what you've done! Now he's prolly crying!
  • Wasn't he the one that uses the foes as just intermediate friends? He wanted the set of people that he wanted to upmod what they said, but didn't want to follow their journals per se? I remember someone saying they had that desire, and while I agree with them that such a group is highly useful, I think misusing the foe-system can be easily misinterpreted. Then again, as I type this I now think Chach said something about foeing FK for use of "potty mouth." Now, I can't remember... I should go drink now
    • Hmmm. That would be very interesting. Clever manipulation of the system. And you're right -- could be easily misinterpreted. I'll wait and see if he checks me up on it when I called him an ingrate. :-)

      He foed FK for "potty mouth"?!? FK is the fucking squeakiest clean guy around here!! (Sometimes it's even annoying, but don't tell HIM that!) WTF is up with that!?

      I have a feeling that it might have a little more to do with religious differences, if Xeri's remarks him about being a devout Jew are true, he
    • I had mentioned the possiblity of doing that. It's possible Chacham had a similar idea, but.... Well, Xerithane pretty much hit it on the head.
    • no, bethanie has it. he foes people that offend him.

      i'm on the fence with this issue. but then, if he ever foes me, i'll have to leave him as a friend on principle.
  • Yeah, he's "politically active" or some such nonsense. He really is just a dipshit though. He's a self-centered, egotistical twit who thinks that his study of his little books of Judaism or whatever is the most exciting thing to talk about. I have a word for people who refuse to adapt and conform to the societal constructs around them: Retarded Dipshits. Two words, I guess, but you can use them freely seperately.

    If you want to be different, buy a fucking macintosh.
  • ...or did his journal entries you pointed to not make any sense. BTW, I added a little gem [slashdot.org], I hope you like it. ;-)

    • I had friended him for quite a while. Slowly but surely, all his JE's turned into this sort of navel-gazing, pointless bullshit. True, my last JE is pointless BS, but at least it's moderately entertaining.
      • I'm tempted to keep him friended just to have easier access to his JEs so I can tweak him on a regular basis. But that's really really easy, so it may lose its attraction soon.

        It's true that most of your JEs aren't about anything in particular -- whose really are? But yours at least reflect the life and personality of a *real person* -- not some pseudo-intellectual punk who has to try WAY to hard to make people think he's profound.

        And besides, you use cool dirty words!! What could be more entertaining t
        • And besides, you use cool dirty words!! What could be more entertaining than THAT?!

          I dunno, but I'm pretty fucking impressed with myself. (Not as impressed as certain other people are with themselves, but pretty fucking impressed indeed).
          • (Not as impressed as certain other people are with themselves, but pretty fucking impressed indeed).
            George, is that you? Heh, why can I totally see you referring to me in a thinly veiled option F Other kind of way?

            heh. And yeah, I am joking people.
  • Aren't you supposed to be packing, not trolling the too-easily-trollable?
  • he hates me too. I dunno why. I probably said something he didn't like. I say things a LOT of people don't like. You don't have to agree with me, heck, you don't even have to read what I say. But don't hate me just because you disagree with me. People are different and people will *always* disagree with one another. If we didn't disagree, what would be the point to Slashdot? It'd be just a bunch of me, too, posts. How fun would that be?

    • Oh, I dunno, this thread is pretty fun -- and it's all basically a bunch of "me toos" that Chacham is a Fucktard (my favorite term for him yet).

      Fucktard. That's so funny. Sounds like a kind of lingerie they'd sell at Frederick's of Hollywood -- something for Samantha (a la Sex and the City) to wear.

      ....Bethanie....
      • Fucktard. That's so funny. Sounds like a kind of lingerie they'd sell at Frederick's of Hollywood -- something for Samantha (a la Sex and the City) to wear.

        When I first saw the word, I personally envisioned a leotard with holes in the appropriate places. :)

        So it sounds like you and I are in agreement then. ;)

      • Best non-complimentary phrase I've ever seen:

        Shit guzzling fucktard

        It just rolls right off the tongue. Chacham would probably pass out on sight.
  • ...on one of his journal entries today. Some of his stuff sounds like a high-schooler trying to be profound. And the JE's are contradictory. Having had some college philosophy (and some "life experience" :-)), I'd have to say that (1) there are much more interesting philosophical questions than the ones that he has latched on to, (2) the harder one tries to be profound, the more ridiculous one appears, and (3) profundity is overrated anyway.
  • He foes everybody who uses profanity. I said "fuck" in the context "Fuck you, people who stole and burned my dumpster in the middle of an intersection." I thought it the most concise manner in which to express my feelings toward this particular individual. Chacham foed me immediately thereafter. He has a thing with profanity, however that may be defined.

    You probably said something like "doo-doo head" or "fucking pussy." One of the two.
    • Ah, yes. Thank you for the deep insight, SW. Once again, I think you have hit the nail on the head. He foed me after this thread [slashdot.org]. So either he has a problem with my mentioning masturbation (even in a mental context -- which is funny, because all the Jewish guys I've known, and I *do* mean in the Biblical sense, have been quite the connoiseurs of self-indulgence) or the Monty Python quote farting in his general direction. OR maybe his feelings got hurt when I corrected his spelling (which he then went back a
      • that was the best comment i'd read in some time. i laughed hard.

        ok. i'm being hypocritical writing it here. now i have to go post it in his journal.

        as a side note, he claims to be in his 30's.
    • Ah! That explains... Someday he just appeared on my freak list, and I didn't even remember talking to the guy.
      Oh, well, sometimes people just add me to their foe list for some reason that is beyond me.
  • He actually has a JE (if you dig down, and trust me, it isn;'t worth it) where he explained it. And Em and I both posted "Foe us now, cuz we won't stop."

    I've got a JE [slashdot.org] on my fall from CHach's pedestal. It was TOTALLY worth it.
    • i remember that and was looking for it for a post i was putting together a few minutes ago. the post is over now, but i still enjoy the link. thanks.

      he went beyond the unfriend into foe. some people are just very serious.
    • Actually, I remember him saying that he foes people who swear. Don't quote me on that though. I just remember agreeing & respecting the idea. I'm not too sure if I said anything.

      1 might ask, "Eugene, if that's true, then why don't you put more people on your foes list?"

      Well, I guess I got to know most of the people before I realized that they were swearing. After all, I am pretty desensitized. Also, I could filter it out enough that it isn't a problem. Most of the times, you could almost guess what is
      • I hear you. I'm way too olde skool to stop. There is something about the speed of electronic communication (I'm only hindered by my typing speed, which is damn fast, thus all my typos) that facilitates "imperfected thoughts put to text"-

        Online forums favor the swift, and if you have to sit and reflect, the conversation moves on and leaves you behind. Vrave [hyperreal.org] was a fav haunt of mine and my friends in college- on our T1's we'd SWARM- and we would bang our "in-jokes" and tangent off of other peoples comments
  • Navel-gazing is not a crime. Of course, if you choose to do so in public, you understand that there is a high probability that you'll get ribbed for it... :-)

    Most of my Freaks are either well-known trolls (hence all their posts are -1) or aren't very talkative.

    If the navel-gazing turns into full-on anti-social behaviour, then I'll start to worry... :-)

    Hey, I read both GMontag's and SQL*Kitten's journals - and I probably disagree with most of what they say. If I were thin-skinned, they'd definitely be on
  • It must take an awful lot of personal strength to make such comments about someone who is firm in their beliefs. Even more when you don't even know him.

    I, however, do know him. I know him very well. He has been a friend and co-worker for many years. I consider him one of my closest friends. That being said, he is thick headed. But I don't think that is a bad thing. He is a member of a very close-nit society that has a very strong set of beliefs and values. He knows what is right and what is wrong.
    • Listen, TF. For me, Slashdot is about entertainment. It's about having fun. It's about witty banter and pithy exchanges about popular culture, political issues, and pretty much whatever people feel like talking about.

      I repeat: IT'S FUN.

      Sometimes "adult" language and subject matter (what, did he object to the term "mental masturbation" or something?) enter into it. Them's the breaks. If you can't handle the deep water, stay in the kiddie pool. We have to deal with all this good-manners/PC bullshit too mu
      • Actuall, yes, he would object to "mental masturbation"...and probably "fucktard" as well. His general opinion is that that sort of language has no place in a good debate or discussion. Me, I don't care. I'm all for having a good time and witty banter and all...I just don't think it's fair to attack him simply because he marked you as someone who uses foul language.
        • "Mental masturbation"? That's ridiculous.

          And as far as the "Fucktard" goes -- that happened in MY journal -- and I didn't even say it first. I just think it's hilarious. I never used it directly to him, and if language like that bothers him, then he definitely needs to stay the hell away from my journal (and gmhowell's, too, for that matter!).

          As far as attacking him... I didn't. I just mentioned the fact that he had foed me. (And it then quickly degenerated into a Chacham roast... tastes great on graham
        • The problem is very often a "good debate or discussion" runs a high risk of turning into what is most appropriately described as "mental masturbation".

          Mental masturbation is *exactly* what he is currently engaged in.

"For the man who has everything... Penicillin." -- F. Borquin

Working...