Comment Math (Score 1) 6
Before any "why wasn't this done before" conspiracy theories... It still takes the same fuel, energy, etc. The ideal rocket equation hasn't changed. Only the rocket has.
Before any "why wasn't this done before" conspiracy theories... It still takes the same fuel, energy, etc. The ideal rocket equation hasn't changed. Only the rocket has.
Oh boy...This just has to be said:
You've been complaining this and that about 401k for months, yet right here you just very clearly demonstrated that you have no fucking idea what a 401k even is. Even a bad chatbot would understand this topic a lot better than you. You're just sitting here parroting, as in like a literal fucking parrot, whatever the fuck you heard on fark without understanding a god damn word of it.
You're not autistic either, so that's not an excuse. You have FASD, which to outsiders often appears as autism. Autism is not associated with speech disorders, but FASD definitely is. As you've already stated, your mom was an alcoholic. See if you can figure out how to put two and two together.
Did fark scramble rsilvergun's brains, or did rsilvergun scramble fark's brains?
Ukraine (and Europe and many others) would disagree on your assessment of Patriot interceptors. A drone won't intercept missiles. Patriot does. Including Russia's ill-conceived "impossible to intercept" Oreo Shnick. Different tools for different work. That's what combined arms is. Russia is losing principally because they're using the same kind of thinking you're using.
Secondary to that, they think bombing civilians instead of bombing strategic military targets wins wars. Spoiler: It doesn't. Nobody ever capitulated because of bombing raids, they capitulate only after they've lost the means to continue fighting. This is why Ukraine's attacks on Russia's oil refineries is a good idea. Russians. Putler's wermacht runs on oil, not palaces or bath houses. So putting missile defenses around those is rather pointless. Ukraine has no reason to go after those, so why waste effort on it?
This isnâ(TM)t about saving money or helping educators. This is the same thing as removing trollies so that people buy cars. Itâ(TM)s about control.
We think this is the economy. But we wouldnâ(TM)t need prison if we spent that same money helping people instead of incarceration. It costs more than housing and college.
There is more money spent spying on each American than helping them. What if we find that âoelow costâ AI actually costs much more than we are told. Why are we using it?
Take away the air and sell it to us.
If you didn't try to steal copper, your brain wouldn't be fried and there'd have been one less power outage.
...You're sitting here comparing an Iroquois village with a larger landmass and a tenth of the population to a country, and then being aghast at the difference in scale. Besides, since when does your igloo need electricity?
But the US and Israel already have nukes.
âoeDeterrenceâ is the extra terrorism you keep in reserve.
It requires at least ten years of education from a reputable source to be offended by the prior comment.
They program an AI to abuse people and then blame the AI for the abuse.
This is why Iâ(TM)m putting original sin on the creator. You made the kids that way dad. Itâ(TM)s on you.
Term, holidays, term, holidays, till we leave school, and then work, work, work till we die. -- C.S. Lewis