Although honestly I wouldn't be surprised if the study was still bumpkis. I can't be bothered sitting down and really reading through it.
That's OK. We are all just forever grateful that you at least took the time to pretend to be an expert anyway!
"Me or you on the street can tell if a car is speeding through "that light", and we can make a decision split second... pull over or slam on the brakes or any number of things."
First of all, it's "You or I on the street", not "Me or you on the street." Second of all, someone should invent self-driving cars!
You are trying to play a semantic war of wits but you are unarmed. You want to define "thinking" as "something only a human can do", then claim computers can't "think." It's a strawman based tautology.
So there are people are literally, anti-human?
It sounds like you simply haven't experienced enough of the human race and what it entails yet. Give it time. You'll get there.
I am NOMAD!