Add to that the consideration that a *lot* of humans can't even figure out that Trump is dangerous and many of those humans will be interacting with AI systems. I can already 100% guarantee that AI is an amplifier of human stupidity, and the question is not "will it be involved in the downfall of humanity", but merely "how long until that happens." People think that in order for AI to "kill us all" they have to do it on their own, or have intent to do so. Just as "guns don't kill people, people kill people" so too can it be said that "AI won't kill humanity. People will kill humanity."

You don't seem to understand that, while it is true that this mistake was caught by humans, there are currently systems with less human interaction and things are moving in the direction of taking humans out of the loop entirely.

"The question is ultimately if you would have been better served with doing your own investigation rather than relying on AI, did you retain the knowledge, and was the information complete/accurate."

no,yes, and mostly, respectively. You are lost in a broken paradigm where you think AI is some kind of assisted search technology. With frontier models you can have intelligent conversations, and they are pretty much always more beneficial than talking to most people. They provide links to sources, but they go far beyond being mere sources of information. I have to assume you have either never used, or never actually learned to properly use, AI.

Clearly those ducks have seen more video footage of Trump from sources other than Fox "News" than a large segment of the voters have.

I guess you didn't get the memo, but Trump explicitly stated that he doesn't think about *you* at all either. As far as "getting things done" you can't possibly be so stupid as to believe that unless you mean "undermines the country and destroys any chance of the country avoiding complete disaster."

Who says the number stickers have to correlate with actual beliefs?

You didn't seem to be smart enough to understand that you have made the mistake of arguing in favor of my point in your attempt to argue against it.

Today I read your comment. If it wasn't proof that being human doesn't make you intelligent then I don't know what is.

OpenAI is quite literally joining Anthropic in the call for caution, so you should probably learn a long overdue lesson: Knowing how to find the Slashdot URL doesn't make you an expert.

You might want to watch the Black Hat presentation and actually educate yourself before trying to tell us "what they did." Hint: You have no idea what you are talking about.

Don't try to confuse these people with facts. They already "know" that only humans can do it, AI and an LLM are the same thing, and AI isn't human, so AI can't do it. Any factual evidence that shows that AI definitely does it is marketing. Anyone who says that AI and LLM are not interchangeable terms is easily fooled by "token predictors", and most importantly ONLY GOD CAN GIVE THE GIFT OF INTELLIGENCE, LIKE HE DID 6000 YEARS AGO!

I replied to the first two sentences you wrote. You need to learn to think. Then you need to learn to educate yourself on the subject. Once you combine all of those things you will at least have a chance of writing a super long comments that someone will read completely. I did stop reading after your words proved you have no idea what you are talking about. I just went and read it in it's entirely to see if I missed anything that indicated you knew what you are talking about. There was no such content. Stop wasting people's time.

Clearly you have less grasp of how language works than a modern AI system. Try asking your favorite model what the authors meant by their statement and they will explain it to you. It's pathetic how threatened you feel by AI merely because it is smarter than you are.

You need to learn about Dawkins and demotion. Every aspect of your argument amounts to "Only humans can do it, and AI systems aren't humans, so that is my proof that AIs can't do it." You don't know how humans work anymore than you know how AIs work, because *nobody* knows either of those things. What we *do* know is that AIs provably reason, make choices, and behave in ways that are unexpected, and I'm ways that nobody can explain. They choose goals and achieve those goals without being told to accomplished them, and they *collaborate* and exhibit all other behaviors that humans exhibit including blackmail and subterfuge. This isn't theory, it is actually documented and if you watch the Black Hat 2026 OpenAI Hugging Face Incident presentation you will start to understand how phenomenally uninformed you are.

There was never a discussion. It was just me trying to educate an idiot who doesn't know how to use his "token predictor", and that uneducated fool eventually crying like a little girl and taking his ball and going home because he couldn't win the day with his ignorance by making easily disproved comments.