Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:At least Fox tries to pretend its unbiased (Score 1) 277

by StarWreck (#43256453) Attached to: Pew Research Finds Opinion Dominates MSNBC More Than Fox News

Using "Democrat" as an adjective is a Republican smear campaign that is partly perpetuated by Fox News

I assume then that you don't have any qualms with the constant use of "Repbulican" as an adjective on MSNBC and the endless claims of all republicans being rich old white men... and the unceasing claims that being white men makes them automatically evil.

Comment: Re:Theres nothing wrong with opinion (Score 3, Funny) 277

by StarWreck (#43256423) Attached to: Pew Research Finds Opinion Dominates MSNBC More Than Fox News
I think at some point, MSNBC realized that CNN was trying to stay in the middle between Fox and MSNBC, instead of staying in the middle between Left and Right. They're currently embarked on an effort to see how insanely far left they can go to bring CNN left of center before somebody at CNN realizes whats going on.

No, I'm not being serious.

Comment: At least Fox tries to pretend its unbiased (Score 5, Insightful) 277

by StarWreck (#43256303) Attached to: Pew Research Finds Opinion Dominates MSNBC More Than Fox News
At least Fox tries to pretend its unbiased. Whereas Fox has never-ending coverage of why all Democrat policies are bad, MSNBC has never-ending coverage of how all Republicans are evil racists that want to rape all women all the time and kill old people and put blacks back into slavery. MSNBC "personalities", openly, with no hint of irony, call a white republican a racist and a black republican a "house negro" in the same breath. On a nearly daily basis to boot. There is not even the slightest pretense of unbiased coverage with MSNBC, its a straight-up fifth column. It spreads the holy message of the democratic party as though it was gospel, no matter how ridiculous that message might be on a particular day.

I think I'll stick with my BBC News thank you, I like their proper British matter-of-factly way of telling the news and outside looking in approach to US coverage.

Comment: Re:I have a better idea... (Score 2) 649

by StarWreck (#42789961) Attached to: Richard Stallman's Solution To 'Too Big To Fail'
The point is that a company that is "too big to fail" will never actually fail, under any circumstances... EVER. It'll either go into bankruptcy and restructure its debts, spin off portions of itself into other companies, or it'll be split apart and sold to competitors. This happens to one major airlines almost every year! Delta went bankrupt, went through bankruptcy, and then almost immediately bought Northwest and became the largest airline in the world. The next freaking year, the same thing happened with United Airlines and Continental. But all of a sudden its a national crisis and the automakers need to be "bailed out" so they won't go bankrupt? Well guess what? Even after the bailouts, General Motors STILL WENT BANKRUPT!! Bankruptcy court protects the workers wages, it protects those owed money like suppliers, the only thing it doesn't protect is the investors. The bail outs did nothing more than provide golden parachutes for the upper level executives and protect some investors who had heavy political influence. All of these "too big to fail" companies should have been allowed to go through the normal process. There would have been no disruption to "the system" other than investors loosing money.

One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.

Working...