Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:B0ll0cks... (Score 1) 538

There's a significant difference: CP is alleged to have used a personal account "sometimes." HRC used personal email intentionally and exclusively.

It's a demonstration of arrogance, ignorance, and bad judgement that seriously calls into question her credentials to be the next POTUS.

Comment: Re:Politics aside for a moment. (Score 1) 538

Agreed. To me this is the most over-looked/under-discussed angle on this story: the extreme lack of judgement displayed in making this decision isn't a good sign for someone coyly begging us to give her more power.

This wasn't an accident; she very clearly and intentionally made a reckless choice in placing her own personal benefit over the welfare of the nation.

In the end, I think her calculation was that she could make this choice with no consequences for herself and, sadly, I think she will be correct.

Comment: Re:Well damn (Score 1) 379

by Specter (#48984479) Attached to: Confirmed: FCC Will Try To Regulate Internet Under Title II

Had anyone been interested in solving the problem you describe it could have been done very easily: it's flat out fraud to sell me access to the entire Internet and then go behind my back to the sites I want to visit and demand a ransom for my traffic. If the ISPs were legally liable for that kind of bait-and-switch then the problem would quickly sort itself out.

Instead you've nearly guaranteed that you're going to get traffic prioritized in ways you don't like. The only difference is that now you have absolutely no recourse as the traffic shaping you fear will have been blessed by your well greased and totally captured government regulators. You know, for the children or the terrorists or something.

Comment: Re:Obama (Score 1) 706

by Specter (#48362035) Attached to: President Obama Backs Regulation of Broadband As a Utility

The best of both worlds? Evidently you don't remember what it was like to be a customer of Ma Bell. "We're the phone company, we don't have to care," was a good laugh line because it was true. If you think your current locally regulated ISP monopoly is bad, just wait until it's got the federal government FOAD seal of approval.

Comment: Re:No one give a fuck about Connecticut (Score 1) 184

by Specter (#47623629) Attached to: Man-Made "Dead Zone" In Gulf of Mexico the Size of Connecticut

"This is the reason why a lot of people are very unhappy."

I thought it was the movement of little green pieces of paper. Which is strange because, on the whole, the little green pieces of paper are not unhappy.

Perhaps it was a bad idea to come down out of the trees after all.

You can fool all the people all of the time if the advertising is right and the budget is big enough. -- Joseph E. Levine