Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Define 'desktop' ... (Score 1) 427

"...I'm forced to conclude ... that ... Microsoft ... no longer know how to write a UI for a desktop..."

They never did. They stole it from Apple, and you may recall the lawsuit. Yes, they renamed "Trash" to "Recycling Bin," and they put the icons on the left instead of the right. How Apple lost that suit I cannot fathom.

And yes, Apple did not invent this UI either. They saw it at Xerox Parc, and then BOUGHT it fair and square. Then they improved it on their own. Big difference.

PS – I've heard the the smartphone market will be huge, sez the MS Exec. Eight years late to the game, as usual.

Comment: Companies ask for it (Score 5, Interesting) 186

by Sir Holo (#49127461) Attached to: Jury Tells Apple To Pay $532.9 Million In Patent Suit

I am an independent inventor (and Uni. scientist by day). I have tried to sell a basket of CMOS-related patents for 10 years. All I ever hear is "not invented here."

Now, the big Corps. are suddenly "discovering" what I already patented 10 years ago. I have no choice but to sue, sue, sue.

They bring this on themselves.

Comment: It took this long? (Score 1) 277

by Sir Holo (#48945299) Attached to: Indian Woman Sues Uber In the US Over Alleged New Delhi Taxi Rape

Condolences to the victim, of course.

When I say, "It took this long?" I mean that a completely unregulated livery (taxi) service went this long without some Uber driver or other comitting a major crime upon one of their 'customers'?

We have regulations on taxis FOR GOOD REASONS.

The wise will short-sell stock in Uber. Or just avoid it. Too much arrogance and scofflaw-like attitude.

Comment: Re:Still not good enough. (Score 1) 430

by Sir Holo (#48933587) Attached to: FCC Officially Approves Change In the Definition of Broadband

It is true those countries are more compact, making economies of scale easier, BUT even well-populated areas of the US

Don't blame it on that. I've lived in Chicago (in the same building that housed all the routers and fiber), as well as LA, DC, and other large metros.

Even in Chicago, I could not get a reasonable 'broad-band' speed.

(If you don't believe me, it's 732 S. Federal St. in Chicago that hosts all the fiber and electronic broadband. Look it up.)

Comment: It's free advertising. (Score 2) 148

by Sir Holo (#48676265) Attached to: Crowds (and Pirates) Flock To 'The Interview'

Sony is playing off the mass-media hubbub of the "North Korea thing" to seed the movie around – in the same way that software vendors, rock bands, and so on have leverage what amounts to "free advertising."

Surprisingly easy-to-circumvent DRM (from Sony?), articles about the overwhelmed servers, and the advert-aticle of the post (TFA). All classic indicators that someone is trying to create a 'cult classic,' but clumsily.

Or, perhaps, it's because it sucks and they know it. . .

Comment: Alibaba / AliExpress.com – A concise definit (Score 1) 115

Alibaba owns AliExpress.com So, what is AliExpress.com?

  • * Imagine ebay, minus the peer-rating system.
  • * Imagine an auction site, minus a functioning escrow system.
  • * Imagine any online marketplace, minus a functioning conflict-resolution system (despite claims otherwise ).
  • * It's the wild west.

In 20 years of internet buying, Ive been ripped off once – on AliExpress.com. After discussing it with several Chinese colleagues, each said basically the same thing: "Yeah, if you don't speak Mandarin, you're going to get ripped off there."

Comment: Re:Middlemen (Score 1) 299

by Sir Holo (#47673581) Attached to: Writer: Internet Comments Belong On Personal Blogs, Not News Sites
It's pointless to reply in a dead thread, but oh well.

FB & Slashdot are different in most every way. Let's put that aside.

Every source (or originator, conveyer, aggregator, etc.) imposes some degree of editorial bias. Some strive to meet a specific standard, while others bias on purpose, and others to maximize economic gain. Not just websites. Also newspapers, magazines, radio, video, non-fiction books, academic journals, and so on. None is perfect.

Even those that strive for the ideal of being perfectly objective impose a bias — humans are involved. A wise citizen learns the bias(es) of each source, and works to filter that out. He also reads several sources, of known and differing bias(es), to yield a good approximation of knowing "the actual story." Better yet, he relies on rely on more than just a few dailies. Monthly, long-format journalism publications take a broader view (still with bias) that helps put the daily news (i.e., gossip) into context. Also diplomatic magazines such as Foreign Affairs, books on a topic, and so on. Primary sources should always be sought-out, but even then one must filter.

That is, read widely, filter information from anyone, to gain a reasonable understanding of any particular subject or event.

Last point: My original comment was that AOL wanted to be the sole conduit users employed when using internet mail or the web. That model failed. Contemporary aggregators, like Slashdot, don't attempt to impose themselves as the sole interface to news & discussion. FB, on the other hand, is indeed pursuing this fool's goal of luring members into eventually accepting FB as their sole conduit/source, or at least the middle-man through which all goes.

My point was just to make that distinction, as it was apropos. This also implied, then directly stated (here, where it will lay unread), that a any website aiming to be the "sole middle man" will never achieve it. Many examples from the last 20 years are well known.

Oh wait, maybe this time it's different!

Comment: Middlemen (Score 1) 299

by Sir Holo (#47665503) Attached to: Writer: Internet Comments Belong On Personal Blogs, Not News Sites
Yes, who needs a middle-man? Or, who needs "a portal to the web?"

AOL tried for years to situate themselves between individuals and ... other individuals (early web). Didn't work.

I forget who tried it next. Didn't work.

OK, just a list is enough: MySpace, Time-Warner via a reboot of the AOL idea, .... currently it's Google+ and FaceBook.

I can use email (etc.) myself, thanks. No need to run every message and page-view through a third party. More hassle, they read them, and could disappear at a moment's notice.

In future, someone else will think they force their way in to being an uninvited middle-man. It hasn't worked yet..."

Comment: Yep. (Score 2) 315

by Sir Holo (#47627757) Attached to: Why the "NASA Tested Space Drive" Is Bad Science
Yes, N-rays were a false pursuit. (See book "Diamond Dealers and Feather Merchants")

Cold fusion also. The palladium was soaking up hydrogen, which the original experimenters (Pons & Fleischmann?) misinterpreted as demonstrating room-temperature cold fusion.

The public needs understand that un-refereed reports are not fact. Further, even refereed journal articles are not fact. It is only after others reproduce experiments and find confirming results that we get closer to "fact." Even then, it's just "confirmed theory."

Why the popular press loves to breathlessly report on recent journal articles as "fact" only confuses the matter.

Are you having fun yet?

Working...