Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Sadly (Score 1) 125

You're ignoring evidence of outright wrongdoing and egregious ethical violations and pretending it's mere "political leanings". You think you're a centrist but you're not, if the BBC's own internal ethics review isn't enough for you that's ipso facto proof of just how far left you are, all without realizing it. Your ideas of what "left" and "right" are have been skewed that badly.

Your post is a perfect example of circular reasoning. No matter what evidence you're given, no matter what argument is made, you can always circle back to where you started. You've got a way to dismiss and handwave everything away, usually by personally attacking the messenger rather than engaging with the evidence.

Comment Re:The 6th estate? (Score 1) 125

The irony of someone ranting about "genocide supporting Bari Weiss" is palpable. If you want to see what genocide support looks like go read the BBC, Associated Press, Al Jazeera, or the New York Times. Bonus points for the NYT as well since they still proudly list a pulitzer prize they won for genocide denial during the holodomor.

AFAIC, these days the Leftists are far more reliable and objective than any Right-favouring sources I've found.

Agreeing with your prejudices is not the same as "reliable and objective".

Comment Re:Sadly (Score 1) 125

When you yourself are extreme left then everyone else looks like they're extreme right. The BBC's own internal ethical review was utterly damning and shows that they're institutionally bankrupt and corrupt to the very highest levels.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...

This website is one of the greatest scams online. They squatted on an emotionally manipulative URL years ago and then proceeded to simply declare whatever the owner wanted to be true regardless of the actual facts. Meanwhile because of the name of the website everyone treats it like some kind of oracle of truth, no matter how much evidence there is that it's a scam. By your logic I could go and squat on the domain "mediabiasfactcheckbiasfactcheck" and declare "mediabiasfactcheck" to be far left and wholly unfactual and you would have to accept it as divine revelation.

Comment Re:Billionaires bought up the news (Score 1) 125

The BBC's own internal ethics memo damns it as an utterly bankrupt organization. Al Jazeera is state run propaganda from the country that sheltered the leader of ISIS and helped found the organization. It seems like your standards for "good news sources" live in opposite land, or basically boil down to being as anti western and corrupt as possible.

Comment Re: Please sir (Score 1) 193

And it will never trust the USA again, having been attacked while in the middle of negotiations

What are you blathering on about? It's embarassing to see you at +5 insightful. From the moment the regime seized power it's been at war with the US. It's violated every agreement it's ever made with the west and openly pursued its stated goal of trying to exterminate the Jews before turning its eye to destroying America. They never "trusted" America, they just knew some American leaders were either unbelievable suckers or actively supportive of their regime due to anti-western radicalism.

As for a million troops to defend itself the IRGC is estimated at maybe 600K absolute maximum combat capable personnel, in a country of ~93 million people about 80% of which absolutely despise the IRGC to the point 30,000+ of them accepted the risk of being murdered to take to the streets in protest.

Comment Re:Please sir (Score 1) 193

That's just plain gaslighting. Every major western city has been filled with two groups of protestors for the past month: Iranians desperately calling for more international intervention to end the mass slaughter and decades of global terror from the Islamic Republic, and migrants + white westerners waving pictures of Khamenei and hezbollah flags screaming "hands off Iran".

There's been TONS of people taking the regime's side.

Comment Re:The REAL enemy here. (Score 1) 53

The only one who's spoiled here is you. Just because I bought something 10 years ago doesn't mean it isn't still mine and I don't have a right to use it. You don't want to host master servers anymore? Fine. But you aren't allowed to stop me from doing it to use my own product that I paid for.

Comment Re:User Licenses.. (Score 3, Insightful) 53

Simple: Enforce existing basic contract and property law that we've had for centuries throughout the west.

Is it a "license" and therefore the company retains total control of the product? Fine. There must be a full meeting of the minds and adequate consideration. The term of this license must be clear up front. You are 100% responsible for ensuring all maintenance and up-keep for the duration of that "license".

Is it "property"? Fine. The property must be fit for purpose, not defective, and if you actively sabotage or destroy or you get charged with theft and destruction of property.

No more flip flopping whenever the other is more convenient.

Slashdot Top Deals

The Universe is populated by stable things. -- Richard Dawkins

Working...