I rewatched the original trilogy as an adult too and found it to mop the floor with the prequels. The difference is I watched the ACTUAL originals and not whatever even-more-slapstick-and-bad-editing version they're selling now.
Simple: You're either lying through your teeth or simply so bigoted yourself that they seem perfectly reasonable to you.
You're making a metaphor so I know for a fact you're capable of understanding words have more than just their literal meaning. This is no different than calling a notorious coward "hero" in a sarcastic or mocking manner.
At this point you're deliberately refusing to understand plain english. SJW is a perjorative term invented as a response to feminists whining "but that's not TRUE feminism!" every time a feminist did something blatantly bigoted and anti-equality. It's a term used for people who use the language and appearance of Social Justice as a smokescreen for actually being toxic abusive bigots.
This is made exceedingly clear almost everywhere it's ever used, but you continue to try and rewrite history to somehow erase that and defend people who commit felonies and violent crimes using "social justice" or "feminism" as a shield against criticism.
In other words change the device from nothing more than a tiny secondary screen and ubiquitous offensive recording system to something actually functional... yknow... like Steve Mann's EyeTap, that thing that's been around for over a decade now.
I mean exactly what it sounds like:
Anti-GG racist GNAA troll paying for fake tweets: https://twitter.com/TripleSK7/...
Zoe Quinn retweeting earlier offers from same troll: https://twitter.com/MaxShillin...
Archive of Zoe Quinn doing this: http://web.archive.org/web/201...
You would have said "cleverly fought back" because you're trying to defend a domestic abuser that's been astroturfing since the original wizardchan lynch mob.
That's like someone calling North Korea a shithole and you accusing them of hating Democracy because the country's name is the "Democratic People's Republic".
No, people advocating for greater parental involvement for men are called "MRAs". The people who claim to be "helping men" but actively fighting against any attempts to improve family court, divorces, or paternity leave are SJWs like the N.O.W.
Don't forget she was also caught retweeting offers from GNAA trolls to pay for fake harassment tweets directed against her.
The "review" is a straw man made up by the very people being protested to try and spin out on a technicality. She very clearly got disproportionately favorable publicity and coverage from Grayson.
No, it wasn't. The word SJW literally was a perjorative from the start. You're trying to pass off revisionist history to defend people who do shit like commit felonies to shut down suicide prevention efforts and send rape victims info to their rapist as revenge for some minor imagined slight.
The word "SJW" literally exists specifically to refer to the people who use social justice as a smokescreen for bigotry and even violence, it was created as a direct response to the incessant cries of "but that's not TRUE feminism".
There is no institutional sexism. No one has been able to find it.
The thing is -- I read your post, and I think "that's institutional sexism right here".
Looks pretty straightforwards to me.
Well we are talking about a group of people stupid enough to count in their midst domestic abusers, neonazis, ACTUAL pedophiles, and get caught openly committing bribery, blacklisting, and screaming racial slurs at people.
I wouldn't be surprised if Literally Who, Wu, Blue, and Chu and some other big names were on there. Hell I'd be surprised if at least one WASN'T.