Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Good PR (Score 1) 280

by RogL (#43259957) Attached to: IRS Spent $60,000 Producing <em>Star Trek</em> Parody

I highly doubt those shotguns have 14 inch barrels.

Why would you doubt that?
It's a direct quote from the GSA request for bids.

And the minimum barrel length mostly just applies to normal folk. Law enforcement can get stuff that's restricted for most folk, or at least, we need to get the right special permits for. If it requires custom work, what do they care? It's government money.
(may not be custom, I don't know if there are standard 14" law-enforcement barrels, there may be)

I'm sure an 18.5" barrel just would not be tacti-cool enough for our IRS lads, what with rescuing hostages, taking down cartels, you know, all that IRS action-hero stuff they do.

Comment: Re:This is why (Score 2) 1130

by RogL (#42733723) Attached to: Machine Gun Fire From Military Helicopters Flying Over Downtown Miami

The argument I usually see is that when they wrote the amendment they never envisioned something as deadly as a machine gun, tank, or nuclear missile. However, the perspective I feel is relevant, which I never see discussed, is that the people had the same weapons as the state. We may view a musket as a museum piece, but when the Constitution and Bill or Rights were ratified, it was cutting-edge killing technology, and that is what the Federal Government could not touch.

It gets more interesting than that: way bigger weapons than muskets.
At the time, there were privately-held cannon & warships.
Look up what "privateers" were.

If you can afford it, you should be able to get a permit for your own fully-armed PT boat (or whatever the current equivalent is). Guard the dock with some artillery pieces and you're all set.

Comment: Re:From China..? (Score 1) 190

by RogL (#42696607) Attached to: WindowsAndroid Lets You Run Android 4.0 Natively On Your PC

However, the same could be said for the US government which actually has a worse record of abuse of US citizens than does the Chinese.

I'm can't remember the last time the US rolled tanks against it's own citizens...
Granted, the occasional SWAT team or quarantined "free speech zone", but there's no US "great firewall".

US is definitely NOT perfect, but I think you're exaggerating a bit.

Medicine

+ - Humans' Risk for Cancer May Be a Result of Our Large Brains->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "What's the opposite of a silver lining? A hypothesis floating around in the scientific community, and published in PLoS One, argues that our big brain is the reason that humans are so prone to cancer.
The huge brains in humans are responsible for humans' long lives, which is why we are able to spend so much time lavishing attention on our children and learning new things.
But the downside is that the lack of apoptosis may put humans at risk for tumors, since the destruction of malfunctioning cells would lower the risk of cancer. "Reduced apoptotic function is well known to be associated with cancer onset,""

Link to Original Source

+ - $3,000 Tata Nano coming to U.S.-> 1

Submitted by
walterbyrd
walterbyrd writes "The Nano is currently powered by a 37 hp two-cylinder engine and lacks common safety features such as power steering, traction control and airbags. It was originally designed to compete in the Indian market against scooters and motorcycles. . . Along with added safety equipment, it’s likely the car will get a larger, less polluting engine for export markets. Unfortunately, that means the price will increase, as well, possibly tripling by the time it goes on sale here."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Not suspicious (Score 1) 527

by RogL (#41291693) Attached to: Following FEMA's Zombie Preparedness Plan Could Land You On Terrorist List

I'm assuming that you get your water from the tap, more or less. Why would that suddenly cease in case of a snowstorm?

If your water supply is from a house well, then if your electricity goes out (ice on lines or sliding vehicle takes out pole), you will have no running water. There's still folks with wells rather than city water - especially the folks who may need a few days with chainsaws to clear their driveway after a storm.

Comment: Re:Wow (Score 5, Informative) 459

by RogL (#40622009) Attached to: Study Finds Alcohol, Not Marijuana, Is the Biggest Gateway Drug For Teens

I smoke a ton of weed and wouldn't care if they made baby food out of it, but it can trigger psychotic episodes in mentally ill people.

Everyday life can trigger psychotic episodes in mentally ill people.
So can odd noises, squirrels, religion and the voices that only they hear.

Comment: Re:That's a bit narrow-minded, I think (Score 1) 140

by RogL (#39907397) Attached to: How Romanian Fortune Tellers Used Google To Fleece Victims

I'm an engineer and been atheist my whole life, so I don't believe in horoscopes/crystals/palm reading/etc... However, I've found that I immensely enjoy occasional tarot sessions. I don't believe any of that outside those sessions but every once in a while, it's nice to meet someone more spiritual than I am, light a few candles, smoke a bit of tobacco from a bong, engage in the whole tarot ritual (sliding fingers on the deck, etc.), have her read the cards for me and then reflect on how to interpret that all based on my history and expectations for the future.

It's almost therapeutic to completely suspend your disbelief every once in a while and get in touch with the spiritual side (I think that there is a certain mental state that every human - no matter how skeptic, etc. - can achieve if they want to... and it's pretty pleasant, really). As long as you keep it at that and don't ever start to think that you could actually make important decisions based on all that, it's pretty much the most harmless source of enjoyment that there is.

Sounds like you use tarot readings as a more-fun therapy session: reflecting on what's going on in your life, where you'd like to head, and what to do about it. As long as you treat it more like a campy discussion & less like mystical powers, you're in good shape.

Comment: Re:Frak (Score 2) 675

If you don't intend to commit the first strike, there's no reason to build missile defenses. No one is going to attack us, because we can destroy them easily if they did. The only possible application of missile defense is to enable us to make the first strike, and defend against retaliation.

Exactly - that's why there have never been any suicide bombers, and why no one has ever shot at armed police or troops.

People desperate to take or keep power sometimes do desperate things.

MAD relies on everyone potentially in charge of nuclear missiles to be rational.

These 2 things are slightly incompatible. MAD has held up surprisingly well, but as the landscape changes from US-vs-USSR to multiple players, it gets messier.

The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.

Working...