Comment \o/ (Score 1) 21
I just listened to it - IMO, complete removal of the vocal track would make for a better song.
I just listened to it - IMO, complete removal of the vocal track would make for a better song.
I wonder if the AI is trying to tell us something with the song title. It's a little similar to "it puts the lotion on its skin". Perhaps the next song will be "Human runs from Robot" ?
The article says later that Suno "is currently in the middle of a blockbuster lawsuit with the Big Three major labels over allegations that their profits will dwindle to zero in the short term leading to the conclusion that new laws must be obtained to secure their revenue stream.
I too bought memory in April to avoid tariffs. I had to run a stupid python program to generate a dataset that required 96GB of RAM for a delayed project so I figured I might as well bite the bullet. DDR4 was still a good value at that point (it's a problem that can run overnight, performance wasn't too important).
But how are the tariffs limiting the manufacturing supply capacity of RAM factories in East Asia?
Do you have a mechanism to propose?
Do you think they're making enough to meet demand but then blaming tariffs to justify jacking up prices? All of them? It would be an interesting conspiracy but is there any evidence to support that theory?
> How much is this problem is down to AI and how much to beautiful tariffs?
What mechanism are you thinking of where tariffs could limit supply of VRAM from East Asia?
Simple price increases, sure, definitely, but this is described by manufacturers as a supply & demand problem.
Do you have a different angle we should consider?
> It did happened before, but not on this scale and speed.
Check out Meltwater Pulses 1a and 1b.
On the flip side, I have enjoyed the few Canadian shows that made it to the U.S. (especially during the writer's strike).
Warning: Reuters are ad-farming
Meta-comment: It's most considerate to put a link to a non-paywalled source - thanks
Why not save time and fruitless clicks by simply omitting the paywalled source?
What proportion of people are expected to be able to read an arbitrary source of private news?
--
Click our link to read news
*click*
Sorry, you can't read *our* news without paying.
*Closes tab*
On the other hand, If I have an ultralight and realize I need to move over 200 people at once, I know I'd better talk to a domain expert rather than trying to tie 250 ultralights together with kite string.
And even if I *could* tell the difference easily (I am maybe a bit too sure of my ability to detect the bland vapidness of GenAI-generated content...
You've got to give super-props to the way the music industry has been pumping-out bland vapidness for over twenty years. It's almost as if they had foreknowledge of the arrival of AI and that this strategy would enable them to seamlessly segue to AI-generated content.
Super *jumps in air* props!
I think he was probably correct when he asserted "AI will be a part of the way all games are made".
IIRC, he was using that idea (which is speculation) as a starting-point from-which to develop the more general idea 'it does not make sense' - logic fail FTW.
I'm more concerned with the bizarre attempt to cover-up the use of AI than I am with the use of AI. What do they know which we might want to?
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but its the only one we've got.