Let's start with the people who think that there is a planet B that we could move people to. It would increase the average IQ.

Is that song about ICE? Because Spotify is still running especially egregious ads for the American GeStaPo which glamorize turning in hispanic Anne Franks.

We don't need to explore space right now, we need to repair our biosphere.

There's nothing in space that will help us do that in time to actually do it.

If people want to spend their own money doing it that's fine, although then there's a conversation to be had about where that money came from.

It's enough to determine whether a citation even exists, which is what this story is about.

Oh no, acrimony from racists. They would never have been problematic before. You have to put white people in those roles without qualifications or you will upset the racists! Clown.

Wikipedia is still seen as untrustworthy. On some subjects it's fine. On others it ain't. Jimmy is doing crimethink editing on behalf of Israel now.

I'm sorry you didn't follow it, and then felt a need to say so. Which part do you find confusing? The part where it's not actually a deterrent if it's not actually a penalty?

Can you see how I might get a kick out of working on things with ChatGPT, tinkering until it gets it right, and perhaps making a post about it which possibly might benefit others, without money being involved?

---

When the perceptron was invented in the 1950s, it wasnâ(TM)t seen as a âoesimple thing" at all. Frank Rosenblatt and the U.S. Navy promoted it as a major step toward machine intelligence. A New York Times headline in July 1958 read âoeElectronic âBrainâ(TM) Teaches Itselfâ (NYT, July 13 1958: [https://www.nytimes.com/1958/07/13/archives/electronic-brain-teaches-itself.html](https://www.nytimes.com/1958/07/13/archives/electronic-brain-teaches-itself.html)). Rosenblatt predicted it could someday âoewalk, talk, see, write, reproduce itself and be conscious of its existence.â Back then, digital computers only followed explicit programs. The perceptronâ(TM)s ability to *learn from examples* seemed almost magical. It wasnâ(TM)t until later â" especially after Minsky and Papertâ(TM)s 1969 book *Perceptrons* â" that people realized it was just a linear classifier, limited to linearly separable problems like AND and OR, but not XOR.

So at first the perceptron looked like a brain. Only later did people see it as algebra. Ironically, deep learning today just stacks a lot of those âoesimpleâ perceptrons together with nonlinearities â" proving Rosenblatt was right that his idea was the seed of something big.

Refs:

* Rosenblatt, F. (1958). "The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain." *Psychological Review* 65(6): 386â"408. [https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0042519](https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0042519)
* Minsky, M. & Papert, S. (1969). *Perceptrons*. MIT Press. [https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262630221/perceptrons/](https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262630221/perceptrons/)
* "Electronic 'Brain' Teaches Itself." *New York Times*, July 13, 1958. [https://www.nytimes.com/1958/07/13/archives/electronic-brain-teaches-itself.html](https://www.nytimes.com/1958/07/13/archives/electronic-brain-teaches-itself.html)

---

If you check those citations will you be disappointed that they weren't hallucinated?

Remember when wikipedia was seen as untrustworthy? What if you could pick on a lot of things lawyers do wrong, but you just harp on AI because you have personal problems?

Are both examples of lazy prosecutors, but in one case you get outraged and in the other you find excuses why it doesn't matter that the prosecutor was sloppy with facts?

Do lawyers make mistakes all the time that you dismiss in your zeal to demonize anything AI?

Why wouldn't you vote to end such a ridiculous penalty? Remember when we the people undid drug prohibition in many states?

If you have a democratic society why wouldn't people vote to overturn stupid ideas like impounding cars for speeding?

Is the irony lost on you that you provide no citations to support your probable hallucinations about fact checking made-up citations?