Comment Re:Just don't use AWS for DNS. Problem solved. (Score 1) 18
Any DNS service can return any IP address for a lookup, this is not an AWS specific feature.
Any DNS service can return any IP address for a lookup, this is not an AWS specific feature.
Some services are managed through us-east-1 especially when the service itself is global, things like route53 and cloudfront.
This story is specifically about the UK, and their only open land border is between north and south Ireland, so it would be relatively easy for the two governments to work something out.
The only other routes to take vehicles in/out of the UK are by (or under) sea and include passport control checkpoints, so they know exactly what vehicles are transiting and it wouldnt be a huge effort to record mileage as vehicles enter or exit.
It's only for EVs because regular ICE vehicles already pay taxes on the fuel, whereas electricity is not taxed.
Electricity has too many other uses to make a tax on it practical, whereas gasoline and diesel are generally only used for transportation with very occasional lawnmower/generator use.
Taxing out of state vehicles is difficult, but if the other states have a similar system then it would balance out as those vehicles would still be paying the tax in their home state even for miles driven in another state, and vehicles would be going in both directions unless the tax rates are radically different.
The fuel tax system also addressed this quite conveniently as your driving in another state would be limited by the capacity of your fuel tank to make it there and back before you'd have to fill up in the state you were driving in and thus pay their local taxes.
automated image pattern matching has been around for decades
The problem is that the LLM only does one trick. When you start integrating other software with it, the other software's input has to be fed in the same way as your other tokens. As the last paragraph of TFS says, "every clock check consumes space in the model's context window" and that's because it's just more data being fed in. But the model doesn't actually ever know what time it is, even for a second; the current time is just mixed into the stew and cooked with everything else. It doesn't have a concept of the current time because it doesn't have a concept of anything.
You could have a traditional system interpreting the time, and checking the LLM's output to determine whether what it said made sense. But now that system has to be complicated enough to determine that, and since the LLM is capable of so much complexity of output it can never really be reliable either. You can check the LLM with another LLM, and that's better than not checking its output at all, but the output checking is subject to the same kinds of failures as the initial processing.
So yeah, we can do that, but it won't eliminate the [class of] problem.
(Shuffles off and mutters something about how does a greybeard get Vulture Capitalist funding to setup cross continental niche cloud for people that value stability over shiny, with Open Source
Every tech company needs at least three things to start with: The business guy, the brain, and the lawyer. Ideally there should also be a marketing guy, but you can add them in later. Also, none of them have to be male, I just like saying "guy", buddy.
Untrained? Excel is a spreadsheet tool within the MS Office suite with 27,000 features. It requires a tad more training than handing a moron a hammer
Yes and no, depending. If you are building an application in Excel, yes, all you said is true. If you are using one, no, none of it is. Spreadsheets can be set up such that the user just stuffs data into them where they are supposed to, then clicks a button to get results. Or maybe they don't even have to hit a button.
For the simplest useful example I can think of, I put together a spreadsheet which produces a table we use for asset valuation. This spreadsheet changes every year. If you load my spreadsheet, it will be correct for the current year. No user has to think about that at all, they just load it and get a correct table. You can extrapolate this to basically any level of complexity because Excel has VBA and you can script everything. The user just follows instructions, and they aren't even allowed to edit any cells which could break anything.
In case anyone is going this far down the hole, it turned out great. Even though the item was shipped from the US, because the seller didn't respond I got a refund without having to return it.
So far Aliexpress has been responsive to 100% of my issues and I only have needed to be a little patient and not expect everything to be solved immediately or arrive immediately.
20 million cells? That seems ridiculous. Why aren't they using a database for something that huge?
I agree that a database-backed application is the right way to go for that much data. However, Finance used Excel because they could. We all like to talk about how bad an idea it is to do that, but Excel brought financial computations on large data sets to people who can't write any code. It has enabled thousands upon thousands of businesses to do things they couldn't do before without paying a programmer to develop a solution they cannot maintain. The fact that other spreadsheets regularly crater when handed data that Excel has no trouble with is exactly why we have so much Excel.
I like to use Drupal to rapidly create database applications which can handle a lot of data without writing code. But I wouldn't expect someone in accounting to be able to do that at all, and that just shifts the problem domain. Instead of getting stuck with Excel, now I'm getting stuck with Drupal. All of the logic just winds up in a different system that you can't trivially transfer it out of, so you have the same exact maintainability problem, except more people know how to work with Excel.
Require domestic supplies to be at cost, only allow making a profit on foreign sales. Also require that domestic be prioritised so they have to supply the local military first before chasing profits.
Will the official contractors even be willing to carry out repairs in a warzone where they could come under attack at any moment? Probably not...
Absolutely, this could well end up being a life and death situation on the battlefield.
Look at the ad hoc repairs and mode both ukraine and russia are doing on a daily basis. A good proportion of the weapons in use on both sides were manufactured by the other side during soviet times so it's not like they can count on the manufacturer for support.
Any military should be demanding full specifications and manuals for any equipment they purchase.
The same untrained office worker can open a web interface in the same way...
With excel that untrained office worker can mess with the calculations and get invalid results, with a well designed web interface they cannot.
You don't want the untrained workers actually setting up the system, you want someone competent and experienced doing that to ensure that the calculations are accurate.
Typically excel is all the users are given and all they know, so they bodge things together with the available tools.
Most people never consider that there are better tools for what they're trying to do, nor do they have any experience of such tools.
If someone does, and asks for proper tooling they usually get pushback.
Reselling is definitely shady. But there would be no scope for such schemes if the price was fair. It's not.
A thief is a thief, and there is nothing more ignoble than a thief who commits his crimes in the name of a worthy cause.
The legendary Robin Hood robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. Was he wrong? Was his cause not worthy? He was fighting greed-- excessive, damaging taxation and hoarding of wealth. Today, greed has again arisen to become one of our biggest problems, with these super rich using their immense wealth to corrupt our systems to unfairly direct even more wealth to them.
Your use of the term "thief" prejudices your argument. Copying is not theft. Copying is copying. Pirating a TV signal, maybe that should be a crime, but it shouldn't be lumped in with theft. For years, the entertainment industry has been trying to convince the world that sharing is theft. Don't do their dirty work for them.
Yes, I am aware TorrentFreak ran the story. They are one of the few exceptions to the near universal censoring and propagandizing the media does on this issue.
The absent ones are always at fault.