Doesn't matter, fewer people suffering is still better than nothing. The fact you don't care about the actual number of people supposedly suffering speaks volumes about what you really care about - i.e. Hating Apple, not some guy in China just happy to have a good job.
but it's not easier to bring a tablet and a laptop than to just bring a laptop, right?
No, but it is easier to bring just a laptop than a tablet. Any USB source charges it. You can carry it more easily, and use it in more places.
since a laptop does everything a tablet does
Not actually true (touch interface far better for things like drawing) but let's pretend it is.
A laptop may be able to do everything a tablet does but if the tablet is far lighter and has better batter life guess which most people would rather have on a trip?
In a foreign country would you rather wander around looking for a WiFi cafe with a tablet tucked in your purse, or a backpack with a laptop?
This is exactly why tablets have done as well as they have, because they replace laptops for some scenarios where portability is more convenient.
i'm in BT range of my phone 99% of the day, and i think that's pretty typical.
And I'm in quick viewing range of my phone 99% of my day, which is also typical. They are the same thing...
You are joking, but if you really thought that was a problem then you would be cheering for the workers to be out of jobs you consider unhealthy for them.
So the fact you are not cheering, why is that again?
the tablet allows them to
Yes, because it's a lot easier to bring a tablet with you than a laptop. So you may well have a tablet around when there is no laptop to open.
The same is not true of any modern smart watch, which by design only really does much when a smart-phone is in your pocket.
Because you are used to the area, you do not think about driving as much near home - instead thinking about what you will do where you are going or when you get home, when you are close. It's easy to grow inattentive and miss a change that leads to an accident.
Picking someone up and dropping someone off has none of the risks of familiarity since each situation is different.
They used a machine for census taking and made under license by a German company.
That is like blaming IBM for all the things that people did with IBM PCs.
Look, it is just a big aluminum tube in the air...
stick a pull tab on it for emergencies and call it good.
is protecting it's future employees, customers, and H1B visa holders.
Simple to fix: unimproved land is taxed, land with improvements is not taxed.
You could go one further, and this would make sense much like not taxing food, that land which sole purpose is to provide housing to the property owners is not taxed, commercial land and unimproved land is taxed.
What are you talking about?
Look, we all know you are lost at this point but the deal is that with system extensions a user of your app can perform different editing of images in your app based on what other applications they have installed.
Did you even look at what iOS8 can do at all? Or are you just totally ignoring the key point?
This is about using Adobe's services which are then available from whatever platform you target
Try reading yourself noob.
I am talking about allowing your application to make use of system extensions which means no two apps are alike in use.
Actually yes it is, if you've developed an image editing application you want it to produce the same results on whatever platforms you target.
Actually no it's not. If your image editing program can make further use of external plug-ins, then you don't care about having it produce the same across platforms because it will never be the same FOR EACH USER.
Would you truly argue that image editing programs should not allow for plugins, that there is no value? Because you are.
There is some base level of functionality it is useful to provide. But my point is why would you PAY for only that base?
So either that means you embed this thing in iOS8 and have a separate way to get to it from the system extensions for editing, which means it's not the same as any other platform...
Or you don't use it and just use the system extensions which means it's not the same as any other platform...
OR you only us this and don't allow system extensions in which case it's the same across all platforms and zero people are using your product on iOS because every other app gets to use system extensions for editing instead of your singular library.
Well, and take Slashdot as an example, specifically AGW discussions.
Pro AGW posters post pro AGW posts... non-AGW mods mod them down.
AGW skeptics post skeptical AGW posts... AGW mods mod them down.
Posters need to decide if they are willing to take the Karma hit of posting their contribution, especially if they are in the minority view
In the end, the filtering is imposed to bring a hegemony to the subject, rather than open discussion.
It is legal proof of wrong doing, not a logical or scientific proof. By those standards, it is an assumption.
But if Spoliation is in evidence, then the alleged wrongdoing is "proved" too have happened and a jury can be instructed to consider it proved.
AS for the emails, the IRS has a requirement to keep them for 7 years, and that is done on the servers, they use exchange.
ALso, they are required to make hard copy prints of critical emails. Not having those printed files is proof of not following the email retention standards.