Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:What's the range? (Score 2) 28

The other post linked the study.
As far as I can tell yes, your supposition that there's "averaging" going on is correct. Insofar as I can see (I skimmed it, certainly) they report roughly similar quantities of data from makes and females going into their analysis, but after that it's all lumped together.
Further, while they acknowledge in their analysis that their data is biased toward West, anglophone, rich cultures, I feel like they universalize their conclusions a little too freely.
Really fascinating stuff here, but imo their data is a bit too summarized.

Comment You are so funny (Score -1, Troll) 99

Y'all would LOVE this if it were set in motion by the autopen corpse of Biden ... and you do know that, deep down, when today's 2-minute hate* wears off. Part of you knows this, under the layer of black and white thinking.

(* Orwell was so prescient, but for the love of all that's holy, if it were only two-minutes ...)

Comment Science? (Score -1, Troll) 91

"It is important to differentiate between the highly toxic PFAS such as PFOA and PFOS for which the EPA has set drinking water standards, versus less toxic PFAS in pesticides that help maintain food security," notes Doug Van Hoewyk, a toxicologist at Maine's Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry. He added that concerns about food residue depend on the PFAS and the quantity.

Don't try to confuse us with your scientific mumbo jumbo about distinguishing different chemicals from each other! And your lying MAGA concepts like "quantity"! We know pure evil when we see it!

Slashdot Top Deals

The economy depends about as much on economists as the weather does on weather forecasters. -- Jean-Paul Kauffmann

Working...