
Journal Ethelred Unraed's Journal: In order to improve this place... 32
eno2001 née T4D notes that the Slashdot JE Circle is dying (I knew he was T4D, but I had no idea he was Netcraft).
So I have diagnosed the problem: lack of stimulating discourse. However, luckily I have come up with a remedy, which I am sure will dramatically improve the level of rhetoric here on Slashdot and be a shining example for generations to come.
In the future, whenever someone notes their disagreement with what I have to say, I will simply respond with "SILENCE!"
Go on, try it!
SILENCE!!! (Score:1)
SILENCE!!! (Score:2)
Wait, this isn't working.
I think I need to pronounce it more like German.
SILENZ! JA WOHL!
Cheers,
Ethelred
root cause (Score:2)
The third child is even worse, since you and your SO have to switch from man-to-man coverage to a zone defense.
With the fourth child, it's like you're on the wrong side of a power play, and they just pulled the goalie to up the pressure.
Re:root cause (Score:2)
A lack of stimulating discourse? (Score:2)
Zoo Content (Score:2)
For one thing this always means it will be niche. For another, it means it isn't (generally) a vehicle OUT (and back IN. Of course one c
Re:Zoo Content (Score:2)
My commiserations. No one should have to work with Ant. Been there, done that, came away longing for a Makefile...
Re:Zoo Content (Score:1)
If that's not a sign that you need to get laid RIGHT NOW, I don't know what is.
Re:Zoo Content (Score:2)
So I'd be sitting there with girl post-coital like.
She'd say, "What are you thinking about?"
"Hmmn? Oh, nothing?"
Curious, "No really. What?" And she'd get up on one elbow. "I want to know."
I'd look at her, and not being a moron I'd say, "You. I'm thinking about how much I love you like so much and want to put like tons of babies in you. C'mere sugar!"
"Asshole!" and she'd hit me in the arm, put on some underroos and go out an
Re:Zoo Content (Score:1)
Okay, so you're post-coital and piss her off, then she puts on Underroos? Aren't those for like, 8 year olds?
Re:Zoo Content (Score:2)
Next year they'll be on, who knows, Patton style directors' pants and clingwrap. Just makes me glad to be a man and stuck with boring conservative fashion.
Naw (Score:2)
You know the kind where if you haven't foed 3 people and had at least 3 people foe you by the end of the day, you just weren't trying hard enough.
So I'll start: all you conservative, neo-con, GOPers are stupid, mouthbreathing, warmongering, criminal, corprate, facist, poo-poo, doody-head, meanies!
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Yep, we are. But in a few weeks we'll control the Supreme Court and there ain't a damn thing you Pinko Whining Child Killing Commie Loving God Hating Liberals can do about it.
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Tuesday was but a taste.
Re:Naw (Score:2)
SILENCE!
Cheers,
Ethelred
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Re:Naw (Score:2)
Silence,
Ethelred
Re:Naw (Score:1)
You know the kind where if you haven't foed 3 people and had at least 3 people foe you by the end of the day, you just weren't trying hard enough.
So I'll start: all you conservative, neo-con, GOPers are stupid, mouthbreathing, warmongering, criminal, corprate, facist, poo-poo, doody-head, meanies!
Oh YEAH?!? You're a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT!
So... THERE! <hrumph>
Re:Naw (Score:2)
You rang?
SILENCE!
Cheers,
Ethelred
Re:Naw (Score:1)
part of the problem... (Score:2)
to what end? all it does is make her look close minded and stupid. someone made a hijack site p
No. (Score:2)
I find that SHADDUP!!!! (Score:2)
I find... (Score:2)
I find "shut up your pie hole" to be much more effective.
Re:I find... (Score:1)
A guy I work with will get himself into a corner and decide to end the verbal thread with "Shut up... THAT'S why!"
Always good for a chuckle.
I don't see anything wrong (Score:1)
Currently there doesn't happen to be a big political issue that everyone can put their 2 cents in (american or euro, you choose
Re:I don't see anything wrong (Score:2)
I have no idea what you mean, you insubordinate little peasant, you.
Cheers,
Ethelred
It's your lie (Score:1)
^_~
too many people (Score:1)