Comment Six-second videos what? (Score 1) 7
I have never heard of Vine, but it sounds like Tiktok in much much worse. And since it comes from Dorsey, it's safe to assume it's gonna be shit.
I have never heard of Vine, but it sounds like Tiktok in much much worse. And since it comes from Dorsey, it's safe to assume it's gonna be shit.
They should rename it Kessler instead because it's going to be the path to the Kessler Syndrome.
You know, your grandstanding would be funny if it was not so pathetic and clueless. Calling this very basic and very limited discovery "infinite" is really just what an asshole does that cannot admit being wrong.
Actually, you are the ignorant one here because you want to justify your denial. Because scientists are aware they are just human, there are a lot of safeguards in place. The first one being the scientific principle. But I guess you lack insight into what that actually does and why it was created.
Global warming is a settled issue but we are spending millions of dollars on studies to confirm it on the theory that what is lacking is proof.
This nicely illustrates how deep your ignorance goes. This is not why these studies are done. The reason they are done is to refine and get more detail. That will be invaluable for evaluating the impact of things that could still be done and to prepare for the effects.
I am sure if we continue to apply the fundamental principles of "greed", "arrogance", "selfishness" and "stupidity", we can make 4C or even more!
"Compete" with what, that's no flying car, that's an oversized quadcopter drone that can probably stay in the air all of 15 minutes.
This factory flew. Go USA!
Can't hit 88 MPH at startup.
There is now only one way to "deal with it" and it is a massive war.
It is in the making, too.
A slight nuclear winter leaving 50-100 million in small pockets here and there is how it will all end.
At least we saw the best years of the huge manatee.
You must live a sheltered life in your long dead mom's basement.
Literally everywhere things have gone from bad to worse.
New deserts are forming apace in Southern Europe and in Central Europe snow is now a rarity.
Asia is turning into a sweltering hell in the summers, India is enjoying gulf-desert temperatures.
Tree species are dying out, and with them all the wildlife they hosted.
Model projections of the 90s (30 years ago) have been proven correct:
https://phys.org/news/2025-08-...
Lucky you who have no kids and grandkids to worry about.
Indeed, it is not a 4C rise... Yet.
But with the new policies of the trumpistan that goal is now also within easy reach.
The old people have doomed the future - they've always tried, but this is the first time they had the technological means to make it happen.
Good jorb, I guess.
Tables are not knowledge. They are data. They are "basics" for nothing knowledge-wise. What they do is they produce a nice, meaningless rote-learning exercise that can be examined easily to produce an entirely meaningless grades. They are nothing but a waste of time and create a false impression of "something having been learned". Hence, no, we have absolutely no issue if a kid cannot answer "12x11" from _memory_. If an older kid cannot find out what 12x11 is or does not see that it is somewhere "a bit more than 100" and accepts a false result that is one order of magnitude (or more) off, then we have an issue.
It is fascinating how many people mistake data memorization for "learning". Obviously, when you teach actual understanding, then most kids do not do so well. May explain why worthless memorization is still a favorite of many "teachers". May also explain why Math teaching fails routinely and most people fear Math. Math is actually very easy on this level.
"Infinite discovery" is a fact to you? You really need to cut back on the drugs...
Well, if people were at least honest about it. But instead they push lie after lie and that makes things a lot worse. On the plus side, we are learning how incapable humans are, both as individuals and as groups.
Seems you have no clue how Science actually works. You know what would happen to climate scientists that did what you claim? Loss of job, in bad cases loss of their PhD. You know why you do not read about that happening? Because these people do not do it. All published and peer-reviewed models say pretty much the same, and hence one being radically different would be immediately obvious ans subjected to intense scrutiny.
"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.