Comment Re:what else is new? (Score 1) 95
Gender identity does exist. Denying that is delusional and disconnected. Now, it is not a single but but a lot more complex.
Gender identity does exist. Denying that is delusional and disconnected. Now, it is not a single but but a lot more complex.
Spoken like a fuckup that cannot accept reality. YOU are a really bad person by trying to force your deeply flawed views on everybody.
I am well aware of what Money did. He did not think gender identity was a spectrum. He though gender identity can be manipulated and externally imposed, essentially by force. And that is wrong and not consistent with what Science says today. But gender identity is a spectrum and comes from the person in question. Denying that makes the person denying it a liar or clueless.
Given that I encountered the first Mac in 1984 I think my statement still holds.
A real Mac has a 68k processor!
Intel was never good at CPU engineering. The last 15 years or so they could only keep up by doing unsafe and insecure things and because of superior manufacturing. All these advantages are gone and they find themselves without critical capabilities. Comes from arrogance, too high profits and customer stupidity. For another case of this, look at Boeing that cannot design new airplanes anymore, just (badly) customize old designs.
I think the joke works. Just not on everybody.
Yep, that nicely sums it up.
They obviously missed nothing. They know. And it is what they wanted: Maximum engagement and who cares if some people get damaged or kill themselves. Just have some excuses prepared for that and make sure to give plenty of money to the right politicos.
They not only knew, they _designed_ it to create this problem. Because otherwise LLMs would not have looked good to the less smart majority.
We are letting sociopaths run amok.
That is what low-regulation capitalism looks like. The US wants that. It is even trying to force regions (EU), that have better protection of their citizens to drop those protections. Bad people at work.
Indeed. But remember that companies consist of people. And we have allowed pretty bad people to take over the economy. Obviously, there are worse people, but nobody complicit in this crap can claim to be a good person.
Let's assume for the sake of argument that OpenAI and its competitors are trying to do the right thing here and make their AIs as harm-free as possible.
The story says that they did the wrong thing with wide open eyes, knowing exactly what they were doing.
Exactly. They knew there was a serious problem for users. They actually welcomed that because it increased their numbers. These are really bad people. Reminds me of the opiate crisis that the US pharma industry manufactured and welcomed just the same.
You are part of the problem. Gender identity is a spectrum. Have a look at some actual Science before disgracing yourself.
Because this story essentially said that the risks of hooking people got overruled because tests showed it hooked people nicely.
Got it: You ARE a surveillance fascist. How despicable and repulsive.
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." - Voltaire