Comment: Re:On fundamentalists (Score 1) 11
Wow. Sad state of affairs they are.
Comment: Re:On fundamentalists (Score 1) 11
Thanx for the note!
Comment: Re:It was pretty cool in its day (Score 1) 186
*whoosh*
Read this part again: "For commercial-level code... fair enough" - I agree with you entirely on that score.
I wasn't talking about that though - the whole point of demos WAS to use as many tricks as possible, to show off to your mates (and the wider world) for a few weeks, until the next bare-metal coder found a way to do something that blew yours away... If it ran on one specific variant only - so be it.
Comment: Re:Fat chance (Score 1) 161
two words:
anonymous dropbox
Anyone dumb enough to try that under the expectation that the DHS wouldn't be watching for it would find themselves quickly on a one-way trip to Gitmo.
Comment: Fat chance (Score 1) 161
Snowden was able to do what he did at the NSA because he had the wealth to be able to afford to run away. Most people who work in government jobs don't have that luxury.
Journal: Chronicle: Bought a rice cooker
Journal
by
Chacham
I bought an Oster steamer some time ago (looks like this one with the lcd from this one) to steam corn. Eventually, i used it to make rice, after figuring out that the tray holding the rice needs water too; the steam isn't enoug
Comment: Re:I can't read it (Score 1) 6
I think you need a bigger screen. Get a two inch bezel to cover the white space.
Comment: Re:Pft (Score 1) 849
Feminist hypocrites? First time for everything I suppose.
Comment: Re:Pft (Score 1) 849
We all know prison rapes don't count. After all, only evil people are in prison to begin with.
Comment: Re:Pft (Score 1) 849
Not all sexual assaults are rape. Way to move the goalposts. You work for the FBI?
Comment: Re:Pft (Score 1) 849
/golfclap
Comment: Re:AIDS is good (Score 1) 61
I didn't expect the Ninjas.
Nobody expects the....
Wait. Wrong meme.
Journal: Godwin would be ... something something something
Journal
by
damn_registrars
Hmmm, only three comments before someone played the Nazi card. I guess I'm just surprised the racist card hasn't been played yet; it can't be that it is finally played out, can it?
Comment: Re:moo (Score 1) 6
I just friended him (again?) Not used to his posting methods.
Did you the shiny side of tinfoil is a result of burning oil into it at high degree? (What i was told, not what they report.)
Comment: Re:I by no means missed the point (Score 1) 8
If Christ is the meaning of life then why do you cherry pick only some of his words and deeds when describing things you consider virtuous? Shouldn't you take him in his entirety?
What makes you think I don't?
You. Cannot. Be. Serious. Every week you give another example of where you ignore some of His' teachings in favor of others. While I know there are times when my actions don't reflect all of His ideals, I don't pretend to be a motivated disciple.
While I will continue to point out that Marx's communist ideals have essentially never even come close to being realized for any population over a few hundred anywhere at any time, your continued insistence on confusing communism and socialism is quite simply silly.
Trumped by your desperate attempts to differentiate them by, like, an order of magnitude.
The greatest similarity between them of any significance to this discussion is that you don't understand either of them.
National Socialist German Workers Party
Wow. Playing the Nazi card? That used to be below you.
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
I have already pointed out how that has no connection to socialism or communism.
Own it.
You are conveniently ignoring the fact that a political party - or a politician - can call itself whatever it wants. This is no different from Ron Paul taking on a label that falsely claims he wants liberty, or the Koch Brothers funding a party that wants to evoke images of anti-imperialist aims.