Comment Re: Lets all stop pretending (Score 1) 613
The part that counts.
The part that counts.
Understand? Who wants to understand? Apparently no one. So I am serious: Women want equality not of equality and opportunity but of outcome? Fine. I want to see how they react when the first one is innocently executed to keep an equal man/woman ratio of death sentences.
Chris Katko, you can come here:
http://pipedot.org/
Not as many articles as here on
...that it in fact about equality of outcome, regardless of merit or ability.
I have nothing against "equality of outcome", but please in all areas. Much more man than women are in prison. I demand a 50:50 ratio. Not enough women in prison? Release men. Or draw lots for woman. Who draws a bad one goes to prison. For equality. America still has the death sentence? Fine. Here also 50:50. Sometime an executed women cannot be too much to ask for real gender equality.
Nothing to see here... go on.
I suggest you consider why I did not have to...
Right, I forgot... SJW... Nothing else to expect.
Did you even think for a second before you wrote this answer?
...so we should all go back to weaving rugs in caves with the other women.
This is only half true. Weaving rugs, sure, but don't forget all the dirty or dangerous tasks, which only men can and should do.
Right, if I speak with my grandad about modern feminism and just replace the word 'men' with 'Jews', I would get some very modern viewpoints.
I did some reviews. No names. But usually one knows from which group a paper came. People working in similar areas know each other. And giving papers to reviewers, who have no association to a certain subject at all rarely makes sense.
And.. gender studies... High probability that the sectarians tried to cash in a vaginal bonus.
It's possible this paper (which was on gender differences) is a piece of crap.
You primitive misogynist. This paper was written by Go^H^H women. Don't you know? Listen and believe... or was it hear and obey? I always confuse both memes.
No, not the reviewer. Ok, they, too... But come on.. How misogynistic is it to require that an article, which was written by women, has to be reviewed at all? Worth than doubting the words of Jesus. Naturally worse, Jesus was a only man.
She just has to claim she got because of this law suit rape and death threads and had to leave her house. In no time she is a twitter star and.....??????
Oh, you don't like it? Sure, one is not even allowed to think this. Women NEVER lie about rape. And if they do...nooo, they still don't. So better shut up.
Don't like the The Telegraph? There are other examples.... oops... Not a singular case? Must be a conspiracy of the patriarchy.
http://jonathanturley.org/2009...
At least the police acted correctly . But the stupid journalists definitely need another brainwash.
Or she just did not have the money to pay the fare. But of course, this is misogynistic. Something like that NEVER happens.
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.
