That's a good question and I honestly can't say it's come up. My guess is that if you are in single user mode then the lock is ignored. But that is just a guess, I'll have to experiment with sometime.
Fail2ban has worked well for me over the years. It's pretty easy to set up given it's sane, sensible defaults. Not comparing it to denyhosts, haven't use that. Just noting an alternative...
www.fail2ban.org
I see this all the time too. PubKey authentication only, Fail2Ban and no root logins help to keep the log clutter to a minimum.
After finally weening myself off of using the root account locally I now just lock root completely. "sudo passwd -l root". Doesn't disable root so "sudo su -" still works but you can't login directly as root when the password is locked.
Although there is less traffic in the logs now I still get some entries before F2B kicks in and I find some of the non-root attempts very amusing... oracle, admin, ftp, PlcmSpIp, zhangyan
Some are obvious service user account attempts and some are just weird!
Hi, I was the original submitter. My summary was terse and simply contained a one line description of what I understood the article to be about and a quote of the last two sentences about pitting licenses against each other and the line that says "My name is Christopher Allan Webber. I fight for the users, and I'm standing up for the GPL.".
I agree that they took some editorial liberty and made it sound more controversial than I felt it was but I was still happy to see it posted as Christopher seemed to think it wouldn't get noticed and seemed peeved he wasn't able to respond to the talk at OSCON.
It was also the last talk of the night, and there was really no venue to respond to it
But it needs a response... even if the only venue I have at the moment is my blog. That'll do.
There is no reason to pit permissive and copyleft licensing against each other. Anyone doing so is doing a great disservice to user freedom. My name is Christopher Allan Webber. I fight for the users, and I'm standing up for the GPL.
I've only been to
Open-source software is cost-effective (in theory), easily accessible and represents a known development quantity that allows the pace of application innovation to accelerate.
There’s one issue: open-source also represents a vast, unpatched quagmire of cyber-risk that’s putting public safety at grave risk.
Suspiciously absent from the article is any mention of vulnerabilities in closed source software...
This is slashdot, you want to put this content on Wikipedia.
Well he's pushing for Open Source and TFA is light on details about whose cloud so perhaps he wants to migrate to an in house cloud? Still their problem but centralized a way that various departments can talk to each other easier where as now they can't because of disparate legacy systems.
I do agree with some previous posters about the scope of this project but I don't automatically reject the idea just because of the heavy use of buzz words (like "cloud")...
Maybe, but the writing in the warning seems to come from someone who speaks English as a second language.
It read like person that not know what are articles.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.