Science is not a religion learn the difference.

Sorry if you are comprehension challenged and just dislike anything that might contradict your opinion.

Here are a few things that might help you in the future.

Anecdote : an account regarded as unreliable or hearsay

Speculation: ideas or guesses about something that is not known

Which is the only way to make it better. Right now, it's just a simple wealth transfer tax. It does exactly nothing to in any way reduce the cost of practicing medicine. The Democrats explicitly rejected any attempt to make the law even slightly about things like tort reform or the ability to operate across state lines in order to wildly reduce the unnecessary overhead.

What? He has explicitly said that he has no interest in anything that Republicans tried desperately to add to the mix while the law was being written, or anything they've said since. Why? Because anything that would lighten the load on the people who've suddenly had their rates quadrupled would reduce his party's ability to harp about how many people to whom they're redistributing the goodies.

I couldn't get past the first sentence. It's a 20-sided, and it's die, not dice.

Maybe they're going to spill out a whole cigar box full of 12-siders.

This is factually incorrect, pure and simple. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Which is exactly why your entire premise about being over your own yard or over some other patch of dirt means exactly nothing in the context of your complaint.

But you think they're going to somehow be smart enough, without a pilot's certificate, to stay under 500' above their own dirt, but can't be trusted to make exactly the same decision thirty feet to the right, above a different patch of grass? People who are going to break the law are going to break the law. Drivers licenses don't prevent tens of thousands of deaths every year, involving certified drivers on heavily regulated public roads. Meanwhile literally millions of RC aircraft of all shapes and sizes are flown. Give us a run-down of the ensuing blood bath, would you? Details, please.

Iran-Iraq is a recent counter example. Care to play again ?

"May choose"

Oh man the whole point of this is to force everyone to follow whether they need it or not.

That would be verified historical evidence.

What you are citing as rebuttal is speculation.

And because they're not that useful in warfare,

Umm, sorry for being cynical, but the most useful thing in warfare is a largish healthy population.

Divestment is a political posture. It's the kind of thing you print on leaflets to hand out to the Freshmen. Then they can march on the Administration building chanting 'Divest Now!'

As long as he is dumping his own money, that is all fine and not even much of our business.

But, as recent history has shown, government politicians may choose to force the reset of us to follow his lead. And that should not be allowed.