Comment Re:already done (Score 1) 133
Oh, I half chuckled on your first post.
Oh, I half chuckled on your first post.
Honestly, perhaps you should write a book about it.
Can't judge how much you write here actually happened, but you write it in a nice style
And regarding hitting guys with chairs etc. I suggest you stop that habit
However as long as you have fun, why not, luckily in my country street fights like this don't happen since WWII
Hm
Still don't get your point.
Well except that you are an idiot.
If you cut off the male penis, what then? Can a male reproduce? Sure it can, he still has his balls
Can he have sexual intercourse? No he can't, as he lacks the member.
The female clitoris is no more a sexual organ than is the male foreskin. So without foreskin you
Regarding the rest of your post. I did not say, or imply anything of the things you claim I did.
Perhaps you clicked answer to the wrong person, three posts back?
As an example: However, we casually accept male genital mutilation (sorry, "circumcision") as great. I never said or implied that. I clarified, that in christian circles "circumcision" does not happen for religious reasons. You claim in the west, in Christianity, it would be common. I pointed out: that is wrong. The only country I'm aware of is the USA where 'ordinary' males get circumcised
Actually I never saw a male who was circumcised, and unlike in other countries we go naked into the Sauna, and after Basketball games or training the team showers together, naked. Not like in the USA where people after Karate training take on their business clothes and shower at home (how retarded).
So your claim that "Christians do circumcise their children due to religious reasons like all Abrahamic religions, is wrong.
I never indicated in any way that it is fine for me, or that I have any opinion about it anyway. YOU brought up this topic 3 posts back. As I said above: you perhaps clicked reply to the wrong person.
Well, if you want I quote your exact words and debunk your exact words.
Fact is: the quake was elsewhere. Claiming Fukushima survived a quake is just nonsense. Because: there was no quake.
That is normal, after all roughly every 15 years your whole body is completely replaced by new cells. Don't remember if it is 10 or 15 or 20, likely easy to google
So obviously the nervous system loses its 'specialization' for your old art, so are the muscles and the brain.
Your point about it not being a religious thing is a fucking stupid point.
No it is not, and the one who is constantly insulting because he is unable to conduct a civilized discussion, is you!
FGM is associated with many varieties of Islam, not least because many varieties of Islam
That is simply wrong. FGM is forbidden in nearly every country, either by law or by islamic law. So obviously it has nothing to do with Islam, especially if you would remember that the religion was founded somewhere around 500 AD and the FGM practices go beyond 2000 AD.
So it simply CAN'T BE an islamic tradition as the origins predate Islam by minimum 2500 years
Lol,
I don't have any believes regarding this, nor did I say male 'mutilation' - if you want to call it like that - is fine.
Regarding your second paragraph, I don't get at what you are aiming?
You believe cutting off the female sexual organs is fine?
For my part pretty simple, parents should not have the right to decide to cut of anything from their children, that includes the hair if you want
If something is a magnitude higher (factor 10x - 30x, as you pointed out), it is not 'comparable' in its effect to the 'original' thing.
It is quite a difference whether I drink *one* beer or 10 - 30.
The exclusion zone is not what we are talking about
From a radiotoxicity standpoint, they are in fact not really distinct. You may recall that Sievert is a unit of committed dose,
You try to compare stuff that can't be compared. A cosmic ray, a high energy ion, is crossing my body. Along its path it destroys a DNA strand here and there and kills some cells completely.
Incorporating a radioactive element into your body is a bit different. Yes the 'Sievert modeling guys' try to 'compensate' the different effects to get a 'uniform' threat indicator.
Makes no sense IMHO, as all those slightly different forms of radiation have completely different effects.
Plutonium e.g. settles in the bone marrow
Iodine accumulates mainly in the thyroid, causing cancer there. It seems you can prevent that with high doses of Iodine intake, and Thyroid cancer seems relatively easy to treat and surviving rates are high.
Cesium accumulates in bones and sinew
So, your 10x - 30x increase of radiation versus 'normal' background level still simply measures what you can count with a geiger counter. It does not take into account what happens if you inhale some dust on a dry summer day
It does not take into account what you get if you eat something that 'accumulates' the radioactive material, like a chicken or its eggs, or a fish, that have 100x higher level of radioactive Cesium than the measurement you make.
So suddenly we jump from your '10x - 30x' to the more realistic '10000x - 30000x' because a human living there eats an egg or an apple or a fish that was harvested/caught there.
Do you really think the exclusive zones exist because some idiots who have no clue overreact? In THE country that has the MOST experience with radiation victims?
You do know that according to normal regulations the whole coast north east of Fukushima beyond Tokyo, roughly 10 - 20 million people ought to be evacuated?
Thanx for the links, I stand corrected.
It surprises me that this is not wide spread known.
I doubt those numbers
My point is: it is not a religious thing, in fact Mohamed explicitly spoke against it.
I don't doubt that it happens outside of Africa, too. But it sounds hard to believe that it happens in countries like Turkey, Iran or Iraq, which happens to be the three dividing Kurdistan up amoung themselves.
Well,
what was your point? Beginning with the fact that Christians don't 'mutilate' their males genitals for religious reasons but for medical ones, and as far as I know that is only done in the USA. Continuing that 'mutilation' is the wrong term, the correct one is 'circumcision'
Sorry, I really don't get what your point is
What exactly does 'abusive' mean when a european kernel crafter is accusing a 'free speech' american compiler crafter that his compiler is utter shit?
Either the compiler is 'utter shit' and the accusation is a fact and proclaiming so is free speech or it is not, then it might be considered 'abusive'.
Either you are a moron or you should not let other people use your
http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
if I did not miscount, just 5 posts 'back'
I know how carbon dating works.
And rest asured the carnon dating of animals living around Fukushima womt be affected by the desaster.
In 10,000 years their remains look exactly the same regardless if the disaster had happend or not.
Hence: the one who knows nothing about carbon dating obviously is YOU.
I'm not an expert on female genital mutilation, but certainly the problem is not 'wide spread through the middle easts', that is simply nonsense.
Some anti 'east' propaganda of the US? Sounds like it, could not win the wars and now they spread this bullshit?
Since thousands of years this is a practice of african tribes, and now suddenly in the current 'conflict situation' people claim it happens in islamic / persian / kurdish as well? How should that even be possible? Kurdistan is thousands of miles away from the regions in africa where this is common.
The masters, the slave owners, the conquerers adopt a 'black' custom? When should that have happened. Thousand years ago when the middle east still raided africa, or just recently when it fit into anti islamic propaganda? How should that have happened? They hate their custums and look down on it but incorporate FGM? Sorry that asumption is retarded and only shows that the west has no idea about the Islam and no intention to cooperate with their culture.
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.