Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment We're not in the "software revolution age" (Score 3, Insightful) 307

We're in the "war" age. The last 120 years have seen huge advances in the ability to wage war. That is what has driven world economies, and continues to do so. Look where the internet came from - DARPA. Integrated and Large-scale integrated circuits came about from military research. Space travel came from ICBMs, which came after the A4 (aka the V2) proved it was practical.

Without that stimulus, we would not have advanced anywhere near as fast.

It also serves to provide employment for a lot of people.

Comment Re:This whole thing is a disaster waiting to happe (Score 1) 233

IYour "living independently" as a requirement for declaring sovereignty doesn't even hold up here on dirtside.

How many countries are living independently, with no trade of food, energy, cars, consumer goods, medicines, capital, knowldege, etc.? None. Doesn't stop them from being sovereign nations :-)

Comment Re:Useless (Score 2) 75

Prototypes were tested in Afghanistan. They've done a lot of work to make it lighter than existing weaponry. Also, the article is wrong because it come with the 5.56mm rifle, 18mm shotgun, and 40mm grenade launcher at the same time, as you can see from the video. And can your AK-47 share targeting info with other shooters?

Comment Re:Not a fucking chance. (Score 2) 369

Used properly by themselves, they're effective at preventing pregnancy AND preventing the transmission of STDs. Throw in a spermicide and you've got nothing to worry about.

Relying on what the other party says isn't nearly as effective when talking about disease transmission, and kind of silly when it comes to preventing pregnancies.

Comment Re:This whole thing is a disaster waiting to happe (Score 1) 233

You entirely miss the point. After all, wasn't there a time when other colonies rebelled for their independence, rather than "obey the law"? There's ample jurisprudence for that. If you can't enforce the law, it's not really a law, just a suggestion.

Look at ISIS, look at Ukraine ...

All the treaties are "treaties of convenience", to be obeyed until one party decides it's to their advantage to violate it. I sure don't see ISIS obeying the Geneva Conventions.

Comment Re:Impossible (Score 2) 93

I think that one point people are missing is that the wetware is different, and that usually this has been the case for an extended period of time. I don't think that using the Ocular Rift is going to be capable of helping people understand The schizophrenic programmer who built an os to talk to god. Same as there's no way to simulate PTSD or Major Depressive Disorder, OCD, Hypervigilance, or even panic attacks that are sparked by relatively innocuous events.

If you want to get a realistic taste of what it's like, why not read through all those comments that demonstrated a total lack of understanding or empathy, and even outright hostility. Others reactions are a big part of the "experience", and you won't get that using an Oculus Rift.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...