Provide money and guidance to the local school systems then let them buy the approved technology they need rather than what is dictated to them.
Because then all the money will go to the assistant principal's brother-in-law.
That's what oversight is supposed to be for... and if wishes were horses...
On the other hand, there's a variety of lesson plans and administrative tools used in education that can benefit from better connectivity.
Such as?
And the Bible said it was OK to stone adulterers and that you shouldn't eat shellfish or touch your wife while she's menstruating.
Read the Gospel;
Which one? The ones that the Council of Nicea approved? Or the older ones or the ones Luther approved?
See that's the problem with religion: It's made by men and yet is supposed to be above the review of men.
Basically anyone not in a bunker would become an easy target.
If you'd like to assert that falsifiability isn't required
You're the one doing the asserting that a falsifiable statement *is* required for science. I'm not required to prove a negative.
It is not and never has been a requirement for science. It's a belief of the philosopher Karl Popper, and nothing more.
Seriously, the only way this could be spoof-proof is to modulate the laser with some type of crypto.
In practice, by the time you realize that a sniper was targeting you, it is too late to start spoofing.
Which is why you should do it all the time.
Hey, maybe this is why everyone in "futuristic" movies walks around in full-body tinfoil...
It's a new feature on the smartphone app: you could already honk the horn, open the windows and roof, and many other things. Now they added "split in half and eject driver". Very useful, I must say.
Still playing catch-up with the big boys, I see.
To what "accusations" are you referring? You have kept saying that, but I have no idea what you mean. Certainly, I have criticized climate science, when I thought it deserved criticism. But where are these "accusations" that YOU are accusing ME of making? [Jane Q. Public]
Again, your accusations of fraudulent bullshit lies are baseless, and you should have reasonably known that. You made those libelous accusations as Jane Q. Public, and as Lonny Eachus. Because, once again, you're a man dishonestly posing as a woman on the internet. Is that really so difficult to understand, or are you still trying to pretend that you aren't Lonny Eachus?
Lol, you are technically correct.
The best kind of correct.
The first smartphone was the Nokia Communicator. 1996.
Keeping in mind they can't possibly have humans listening to all that, the only way to flag human-worthy content is voice recognition and transcription to plain text files. If you keep voice only on the 0.1% that are "likely" to be interesting, and simply voice-recognize the rest after a month and compress the plain text, the storage problem drops by orders of magnitude.
Yep you could die in an F1 car if you get thrown out (although it would take a very odd impact - if you don't wear your seatbelt in an F1 car, because of the shape of the cockpit and seat, in a frontal impact you'll become a gross puddle in the footwell).
Makes sense, the plane could have broken up on impact and the area where the tail landed was initially thought to be a second crash site. It was found to be part of the same plane, and the fact that the plane's ass landed some distance away is hardly newsworthy.
Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.
