Thank goodness a movie like Life of Brian wasn't released in these knee-trembling times.
I can imagine what is going through the heads of many Korean War vets, that MacArthur should have been allowed to march right into Manchuria.
North Korea really hasn't even proven it has a missile that reliably reach Japan. The country is a total basket case run by a violent, completely detached dynasty. It represents a significant regional threat, but if it were to ever do anything truly belligerent, China would yank support and the regime would collapse.
That, to my mind, is the chief threat of North Korea, that when the Kims finally do lose grip, the regime's collapse will be violent for North Koreans and their neighbors.
Indeed. Of all the groups that make threats against the West, NK seems the one least likely to have the ability or desire to actually attack a Western target. I cannot imagine the fires of hell that would reign down on North Korea should it be demonstrated to be behind mass murders in the United States.
It boggles my mind that anyone seriously believes North Korea is going to start mounting attacks on North American theaters should they screen this film.
So if some nice upstanding code monkey makes a few changes to, say, OpenSSL, the minute he uploads it to the repository, the Australian police are going to come down on him like a ton of bricks?
Meanwhile, some batshit crazy Iranian refugee can buy a gun...
Except that in-situ is an English word. It's origins are Latin, but then again, so is a vast amount of the English vocabulary.
We have these things called dictionaries. Rather than demonstrating intense stupidity, inform yourself first.
Oh right, this is
What's there to translate? It will always end up being "We own your fucking asses, peons."
Well, I always like to point people to this incident as a great example of guns and rage really not mixing well: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/19/michigan-concealed-carry-road-rage-two-dead_n_3956491.html
And it is still far, far more common than in any other western countries that do have strong gun control laws.
Link to Original Source
So are you arguing that the US is less secure now than it was in 1774? Back when we had almost nothing, fighting the globe-spanning England, we rejected torture as being against our principles. Now that we're the richest, most powerful country on the planet, "threatened" by terrorists (i.e. fighters without even the backing of a country) we're willing to give up our principles?
I know, but.. Sony, North Korea and the FBI. Not exactly a triumvirate of trust.
Sounds like someone missed the whole "BP was convicted for failing to properly install and inspect legally mandated safety equipment" thing.
Nice of you to blindly jump to the defense of an oil company, tho. I'm sure they appreciate it.
Instead of "The Interview", a theater in Texas has decided to show "Team America" instead....
Except in Texas they think Team America World Police is a documentary.
I don't know what to believe. On one hand, we have Sony. On the other, North Korea. Finally, the FBI.
Shit, they're probably all lying their asses off.