Presidents whose last names have occurred only once in federal politics have been referred to by their last names. Ever hear anyone talk about RWR, RMN, DDE, HCH, or GRF? No, of course not.

Apparently you've never heard of JFK.

So Bush was right all along.

<NelsonMuntz>HA, HA!</NelsonMuntz>

It's just bad journalism. The actual press release doesn't make this claim.

A Christian's generosity wouldn't be so limited either.

Limited? I'm being very generous giving Wendy Davis anything more than a single digit IQ. Her supporters are even dumber.

And you are correct, I'm not a redneck.

But perhaps I should shamelessly rip off a famous redneck....

If you complain about the government mismanaging Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and yet clamor for even more government.... you might be a liberal.

If you complain that people aren't being compassionate when they don't want their taxes raised, and yet give nothing to charity... you might be a liberal.

If you think that it's not OK to kill an animal for food, but that it is OK to kill an unborn baby for convenience.... you might be a liberal.

They almost write themselves....

Fusta would never go to a retirement home. Not enough tin foil there to help him keep the CIA mind control waves out of his head.

Given the sheer number of retards on the left, this is shooting fish in a barrel.

For example, take Abortion Barbie, aka Wendy Davis, for example -- that woman's IQ is barely room temperature, and I'm feeling generous this morning.

South America too, for that matter.

Except that Europe has a long and active trend of elected female leaders.

Polonium?

For you, the day Bison landed his Space Plane on your tiny village was the greatest day of your life. For me, it was Tuesday.

Say you've got a land full of city states. Verizon-town, Comcast-town, AT&T-town, etc etc.

There is one or more superhighway running into each -town. These super-highways generally meet at an 'interconnect point' or 'peering point.' All of the towns build their own highways to the peering points, and because they all have generally the same amount of traffic trying to go back and forth, they don't really charge each other for them.

There are multiple peering points for various reasons.

Now, if I'm understanding correctly, Netflix-town (think small factory town, like) built a superhighway to a peering point that didn't happen to have a superhighway to Verizon-town. So they argued over who should build that superhighway.

In the mean time, traffic from Netflix-town to Verizon-town had to pass through other towns first, with predictable results.

Netflix has now gotten around to building a superhighway to a peering point that Verizon-town is connected to, and HOLY SHIT, suddenly they can move a ton of traffic into Verizon-town.

But Netflix doesn't take data from Verizon-town, like, say, another large ISP might, so why would Verizon-town pay to build said superhighway?

This isn't net neutrality; that would be the creation and sale of toll-roads *within* the various towns. Once Netflix-town's trucks hit Verizon-town's border, they get on the Verizon-town streets to their ultimate destination, same as everybody else. This just improves Netflix's ability to get delivery trucks to Verizon-town's borders.

Are we talking Western politics, or American politics? They're vastly different things.