The source (Christopher Booker) has published many opinions -- none based on any level of scientific fact. He appears to to have an ax to grind against scientific principles. From Wiki (re:
Christopher Booker):
He has taken a stance which runs counter to the scientific consensus on a number of issues, including global warming, the link between passive smoking and cancer, and the dangers posed by asbestos.
Though he is offering an opinion, most people do have their own
opinion. The fact that he (sill) has a forum does not mean that his opinion is any more valid than scientific research on any of the topics presented.
Voted "down"
... as "Not the best"