Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Why do galaxies have two spiral arms?

StartsWithABang writes: Most mental images of galaxies invoke thoughts of two giant arms, spiraling out from the center and wrapping around, covered richly in stars. Yet this picture, though incredibly common, represents only about 10% of galaxies. Moreover, the galaxies that do have two grand, spiral arms won't have them for very long, as the classic picture we have of spirals represents only an intermediate stage in galaxy evolution.

Submission + - Andromeda's secrets revealed by going beyond visible light

StartsWithABang writes: The Andromeda galaxy is our closest large neighbor, dominating our local group with more than double the number of stars found in the Milky Way. While visible light can reveal a tremendous amount of information, it's by going to shorter (UV) and longer (IR) wavelengths that we can learn where the newest, hottest stars are, find that they form in clusters along the arms and in the center, see through the (visible) light-blocking dust, and pinpoint the location of the neutral gas that will form the next generation of stars.

Submission + - How a failed comet is to blame for Saturn's moon Iapetus

StartsWithABang writes: When Giovanni Cassini discovered Saturn's moon Iapetus in 1671, he was puzzled to find that it was easily visible on the western side of the planet, but unable to be seen along the eastern side. Only 34 years later did he find it on the east side, finding it two full magnitudes dimmer. His theory was that Iapetus was locked to Saturn, and that it had one light hemisphere and one dark one. It took another 300 years, but now we finally know what caused this two-toned world: a captured Kuiper belt object is to blame!

Submission + - Our Universe is at most 0.2% of the way to the first Black Dwarf

StartsWithABang writes: While the stars exist in tremendous numbers (some 10^23+ in our observable Universe) and great varieties, every star that ever has shone or will shine will someday run out of fuel and die. When that happens, the inner core of the star contracts down to form a tiny, degenerate but very hot object. But even so, no object with a finite amount of energy can shine forever. At some point, even those stellar remnants will cool down out of the visible portion of the spectrum. But how long will that take, how will that happen, and has the Universe been around long enough (yet) so that such an object exists? Answers here.

Submission + - NASA Kepler's new "Earth-like" planet may not be Earth-like at all

StartsWithABang writes: Earlier today, NASA announced the most Earth-like exoplanet yet, a planet just 60% larger in radius than our own, orbiting a star of the same spectral class as our Sun and with an almost identical orbital period: 385 days. But is this really the most Earth-like planet we’ve discovered? It’s significantly larger and five times as massive, and may actually be more like Neptune than like Earth. In fact, other properties may be much more important if we truly want to find a “twin” to Earth: a rocky planet teeming with advanced chemical-based life.

Submission + - How pentaquarks may lead to the discovery of new fundamental physics

StartsWithABang writes: Over 100 years ago, Rutherford's gold foil experiment discovered the atomic nucleus. At higher energies, we can split that nucleus apart into protons and neutrons, and at still higher ones, into individual quarks and gluons. But these quarks and gluons can combine in amazing ways: not just into mesons and baryons, but into exotic states like tetraquarks, pentaquarks and even glueballs. As the LHC brings these states from theory to reality, here's what we're poised to learn, and probe, by pushing the limits of quantum chromodynamics.

Submission + - Darkness makes the night sky appear brighter

StartsWithABang writes: It's paradoxical how our eyes work: we adjust to the brightness of everything around us. A modestly illuminated night sky will leave just a few dozen stars and planets visible, while if you take that light pollution away, thousands of stars, the Milky Way and even galaxies can be seen with the naked eye alone. Perhaps surprisingly, there's a country out there with high mountains, dark skies, and great seeing that values astronomy: Chile. A great report from astrophysicist Brian Koberlein as he forays into observational astronomy and voyages to Chile to find out firsthand!

Submission + - Global warming will destroy the Earth, in the very end

StartsWithABang writes: If it's weren't for our atmosphere at all, the average temperature on Earth's surface would be a paltry 255 kelvin (-18 C / 0 F), so the greenhouse effect does plenty of good by warming us an additional 33 C (59 F) on average. But over timescales of hundreds of millions of years, the Sun's energy output increases as its core temperature — and the rate of fusion — heats up. In one-to-two billion years, the Earth's oceans will boil, ending life as we know it on our world. Perhaps we're very lucky life evolved as fast as it did on Earth; a little slower and intelligent life may never have had a chance.

Submission + - Can moons have their own satellites?

StartsWithABang writes: In the solar system, everything orbits the Sun: planets, asteroids, kuiper belt objects and more. That is, unless an object is in orbit around one of those, like a moon or a satellite object. Is it possible, then, for a moon or satellite to have another level: an object that orbits it, in turn? While we presently haven't discovered any in our Solar System, it is theoretically possible, with numerous candidates already identified for where to look for such objects.

Submission + - Stars accelerate their burning when they run out of fuel

StartsWithABang writes: Our Sun, like all stars, spends most of its life burning hydrogen into helium, placing it on the main sequence. When we run out of fuel, we'll start fusing helium into carbon, a process that still takes a long time, but not nearly as long as hydrogen burning. In the most massive stars, this will be followed by phases of carbon burning, oxygen burning, silicon burning and more. Yet even as there are more phases to undergo, these phases take increasingly shorter amounts of time, and a star running out of fuel literally sees its life end in the blink of an eye.

Submission + - What can our Universe teach us about higher dimensions?

StartsWithABang writes: When it comes to the fabric of our Universe, we live in four dimensions: three space and one time. At least, that’s what it seems like. But it’s possible that at very high energy scales — or at very small distance scales — not only might even more forces unify, but we might discover that the interactions between particles spill over into even more spatial dimensions. Through concepts like unification, duality and holography, we're starting to understand exactly what might be relevant for our Universe, and what might be forever beyond our reach.

Submission + - Is Pluto a planet again in the aftermath of New Horizons?

StartsWithABang writes: Back in 2006, the International Astronomical Union officially defined the word “planet” for the first time, claiming that as long as something met all three of the following criteria:

1.) It was in hydrostatic equilibrium (pulled itself into a spherical/spheroidal shape under its own gravity),
2.) It didn’t orbit any other body larger than itself (i.e., wasn’t a moon), and
3.) Cleared its orbital path of all other major bodies,

then it got to be a planet. By that definition, Pluto was out. And yet, Pluto and all the other Pluto-like objects out there in the Kuiper belt are not only paramount to the formation of our own Solar System, these objects vastly outnumber the planets. Not only our Solar System’s planets, but the icy, lonesome Kuiper belt objects outnumber the planets galaxy-wide. With everything we’re learning about it, is it time to reinstate Pluto’s planethood?

Submission + - Why it will take New Horizons 16 months to transmit its data to Earth

StartsWithABang writes: The speed of light requires a little over four hours to send a signal from Pluto to Earth. With NASA's New Horizons having just completed its flyby the morning of July 14th, you might think that it's only a short matter of time before we have everything it has to offer. But in reality, when it begins data transmission, it will take a full 16 months to transfer the full suite of its data to us. Here's the science of why.

Submission + - Why doesn't our Solar System have a super-Earth?

StartsWithABang writes: In our own Solar System, there are the four gas giant worlds, the four inner rocky worlds, and then a bunch of icy and rocky bodies smaller than those. But in other solar systems, there’s a whole class of worlds in between the size of Earth and Neptune, called either super-Earths or mini-Neptunes. This class not only exists, but it’s the most common type of planet in the Universe, to the best of our knowledge. Here's why we think we don't have one (now), owing to the unique, migratory history of our own planets.

Submission + - The Multiverse may not be science after all

StartsWithABang writes: A scientific theory needs to meet three criteria: it needs to explain all the successes of the previous leading theory, it needs to explain any failures or shortcomings that its predecessor couldn't, and it needs to make new, testable predictions that can either be falsified or verified. If the Multiverse doesn't meet that third criterion, can it be considered science? A fascinating exploration leads us to conclude that no, perhaps it isn't science after all.

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...