Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Display Devices Were Worth It (Score 1) 329

by retroworks (#43625613) Attached to: Is Buying an Extended Warranty Ever a Good Idea?
Extended warranties were always bad, until I tried one for a new technology, flat screen monitors. I bought a 17" which failed, and when it failed, Best Retailer had no 17" to replace it with, and replaced it with a 19". When that failed, and I went back, they had to replace it with a 23". Now, if I'd put the money in a piggy bank, the money would have gone farther towards buying a 23" than it did in 2006... so some of this is false economy. But the screens also became more dependable and failed less. I also paid for extended warranty on the "second screen", a flat Sony LCD, in 2007. It still works fine.

+ - "Illegal to Possess" - Feds Raid IPhone Repair Shops-> 2

Submitted by retroworks
retroworks writes "In Florida, Federal Agents with the Department of Homeland Security have raided 25 Smartphone repair shops in South Florida and have seized between $250,000 and $300,000 in counterfeit Apple parts.

"It's a wide investigation that is multi-state. We are looking at whole industry spectrum of repair shops that are using substandard products," said Gerard O'Neill, Assistant Special Agent in Charge of Miami Field Office for Homeland Security. O'Neill says it's a public safety issue and that is how Homeland Security is involved. He says consumers have be hurt by overheating phones that were repaired using counterfeit parts.

"There are trademark and licensing violations as well," he added.

Apple says if a repair shop puts counterfeit parts in your phone it will void any warranty. "Unless they are getting it from an Apple authorized manufacturer, they are most likely getting substandard parts which are counterfeit and illegal to possess," Said Agent O'Neill.

Move along, Slashdot? Nothing to see here?(thanks to Kyle at IFIXIT for the tip)"

Link to Original Source

Comment: 1980 High School Arkansas (Score 5, Insightful) 215

by retroworks (#43610737) Attached to: Alaskan Middle Schoolers Phish Their Teachers

A chum in my science seminar class hacked into the principal's office phone, so we could listen to him from the classroom whenever we wanted. When it was close to graduation, he got bored and patched the phone line into the school public address speakers, so all day his calls were broadcast in every classroom (they figured it out and he stopped using his phone after an hour or so).

After lunch, the principal called our buddy up to the office. He asked him "Do you by any chance know something about this?" Our buddy said "Yep." Principal said, "Just go fix it and we won't ask any more questions, ok?" He did, and that was that, no call to his parents or anything.

Now in the early 1950s, when my DAD was in high school, they just led a cow upstairs and locked it in the bathroom (Cows can walk up stairs better than they walk down). It's pretty easy to imagine the same kids pulling the same kind of pranks with the technology of the day.

+ - By 2017, Most Companies Will Require You To Bring Your Own Mobile Device->

Submitted by Lucas123
Lucas123 writes "One radical change the consumerization of IT trend is expected to spawn is that by 2017, half of all employers will require workers to supply their own devices for work purposes, according to a new Gartner study. Enterprises that offer only corporately-owned smartphones or stipends to buy your own will soon become the exception to the rule in the next few years. As enterprise BYOD programs proliferate, 38% of companies expect to stop providing devices to workers by 2016 and let them use their own, according to a global survey of CIOs by Gartner. At the same time, security remains the top BYOD concern. "What happens if you buy a device for an employee and they leave the job a month later? How are you going to settle up? Better to keep it simple. The employee owns the device, and the company helps to cover usage costs," said David Willis, a distinguished analyst at Gartner."
Link to Original Source

Comment: "Fact": People who repair tech are "primitive" (Score 1) 347

German 3Sat.de television did a great story on how many Germans believe that people who buy used tech, especially Africans, must be burning them. Five studies ( posted here on /.) from organizations like Basel Convention Secretariat, IDC, USITC, etc. show that 85%-90% of used equipment purchased by Africans is reused in internet cafes, hospitals, and schools. But "Westerners" (in this case Germans) are so afraid of being accused of dumping they shred the equipment (forcing African geeks to buy in back alleys). This is just another example of a decade old defamation campaign about reuse.

A good organization serving as an "anti defamation league" for geeks of color http://www.fairtraderecycling.org/ has links to the 2011 German video, showing how German environmentalists would have kept the Green Revolution / Arab spring from ever happening.

+ - Studies, Experts Refute Environmentalist Watchdog Claims of 80%"E-waste Dumping"->

Submitted by retroworks
retroworks writes ""They came to our African city dumps and photographed children burning scrap — scrap that was thrown away after decades of use. Then they said our African businessmen and women had imported the junk recently, and dumped 80-90% of it. Our entrepreneurs have been arrested, and our internet cafes and hospitals denied IT equipment, and our citizens told to buy brand new devices which they cannot afford, or which — when made cheaply — fail at a higher rate than the quality used equipment. And the Environmentalist who use our children's images keep the money, and don't share a dime with Africa."

This damning quote from Jean Frederic Fahiri Somda of Burkina Faso , who opened the Vermont Fair Trade Recycling Summit, was not the first to defend Africans accused of creating "e-waste" dumps in European and USA media — an allegation that has recently resulted in the arrest of 40 African export businesses in Europe, and allegations by EPA that Egyptian businesses who purchased CRT monitors in the USA for $21 each intended to crudely recycle them.

At the FTR Summit, Field Studies and Surveys from US International Trade Commission, Basel Convention Secretariat, IDC, MIT, Memorial University, ASU, etc. presented at the Summit consistently predicted that 85-90% of used electronics purchased by Africans will be reused for years before reaching the dump. African representatives claimed that USA and European reused equipment is less prone to returns than affordable (Chinese) new equipment."

Link to Original Source

Comment: As bad as the real thing??? Really?? (Score 1) 595

by retroworks (#43448499) Attached to: Is Bitcoin Mining a Real-World Environmental Problem?
45% of all toxics released by all USA industry come from hard rock metal mining. 14 of the 15 largest Superfund Sites are hard rock mines. Mining of tanatalum for electronics (coltan) is responsible for the disappearance of half of the lowland gorillas. It kind of bothers me when "environmentalists" have zero depth perception, no ability at all to prioritize risks.

+ - Summit of Researchers to Debate Electronic Waste Dumping Allegations-> 1

Submitted by retroworks
retroworks writes "Middlebury College Environmental Studies is hosting a Summit of researchers of "e-waste" or WEEE exports on April 16. The Summit will be streamed online at www.fairtraderecycling.org. The Summit is funded in part by a Canadian grant of $479,000 to Memorial University, University CP de Peru, and USC (LA). Researchers organized the Summit in order to interview actual importers of used electronics in five countries. They will be joined by experts from MIT, Monterrey Tech Guadelajara, University of Amsterdam, and Universite Paul Cezanne of France. A representative of the Swiss Basel Convention will speak about 2-year studies in Nigeria and Ghana, and the US International Trade Commission will update attendees on its new 2013 calculation, that 88% of used electronics exports are reused.The Researchers from Peru, Basel Convention, US ITC, and others have consistently found 85%-90% of the used electronics purchased by Africans, Asians, and South Americans are reused, that the 10-15% fallout is comparable to new goods, and that material filmed at dumps is collected from cities in emerging markets which have used up the equipment imported decades earlier. IT importers from Egypt, Ghana, Burkina Faso, Peru, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Angola, and Colombia are attending the Summit, to meet students, and explain that they cannot afford to pay $21 per unit, plus thousands in shipping, to burn material on the ground.

Fair Trade Recycling, an international NGO based in Vermont, organized the Summit. EPA, Interpol, and other enforcement agencies have committed to participate online. The enforcement agencies will be asked who originated the statistic that 75% of the imports are dumped and burned (creating a presumption of guilt among used IT importers). FTR representatives hope to shift the burden of proof, so that exports of used IT are not presented as de facto "e-waste", and to address the need for appropriate recycling techniques and hand disassembly systems. The association of exports with "primitive" recycling and dumping (via widespread coverage by CBS 60 Minutes, Frontline, USA Today, Oprah, NPR Fresh Air, etc.) doesn't address the problem if those wastes were not recently imported. (a Seattle NGO has emerged as the probably source of the claim that 75%-90% of used IT imported by Africans are immediately sent to be burned in dumps). Meanwhile USA EPA and Interpol continue to support 'Project Eden', which announced arrests of 40 African tech entrepreneur importers last month. A recent press release from EPA states that a USA exporter in Michigan sold 100,000 CRT monitors to Egypt prior to the revolution for $2.1M, an average value of $21 before shipping. Critics cite EPA's claim of dumping as an example of profiling of African importers as "primitives", when the displays were purchased for reuse (and relabeled in response to Egyptian internet control laws).

The Fair Trade Recycling Summit is seeking college interns to visit emerging market importers, to negotiate for better documentation of export reuse. Most African importers routinely take back decades old equipment from cities like Lagos, where consumers "trade up" for newer equipment. University researchers suggest African technicians should not be viewed as "waste criminals", but as an asset to create proper recycling channels for the WEEE or "e-waste".The day before the Summit, Vermont NPR will host an interview with the FTR founder, and with China based author and journalist Adam Minter. Minter visited alleged international e-waste dumping sites in China (like Guiyu, focus of CBS 60 Minutes), and will discuss how much of the "waste" and water pollution cited in the press has come from home generated scrap, residue of reused material, or unrelated sources (like the textile dying factories, a source of arsenic, found upstream of Guiyu). Organizers of the Summit stress that they don't want to gloss over or de-legitimize concerns over externalization of polluting processes, but stress the need for scientific method in accurately determining where the waste came from before arresting and "exoticizing" free market technicians in emerging markets."

Link to Original Source

Comment: IRS simply needs to increase the number of videos (Score 3, Funny) 280

by retroworks (#43259013) Attached to: IRS Spent $60,000 Producing <em>Star Trek</em> Parody

The cost of the video is so high because they haven't achieved a scale of production. We need them to produce entire series of Star Trek, then IRS Voyager, Next Generation Income Tax... then Star Wars, Mission Impossible, etc If enough auditors spend enough time producing enough of these videos, the cost per video will go down, which means the "rate of increase" of IRS spending on videos could go down.

At least until the auditing period for the 1040 I'm working on today is expired. Then pull the plug.

Privacy

+ - WSJ: Interactive Tool Shows What's Shared About You->

Submitted by
retroworks
retroworks writes "The Wall Street Journal has a front page report, "They Know What Your Shopping For", which details the erosion of privacy in regards to consumer shopping habits. Companies like Dataium sell our browsing habits, and in this interactive tool, the WSJ names names — what personal information is shared about you (email, birthdate, name, etc.) by Yahoo, Ask.com, WebMD, Youtube, etc. And they include WSJ.com as well. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324784404578143144132736214.html?mod=WSJ_WhatTheyKnowPrivacy_LeftTopNews#project%3DANONYMITY1212%26articleTabs%3Dinteractive"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Warhol Billionaires (Score 4, Insightful) 50

by retroworks (#42925287) Attached to: Webmail and Online Banks Targeted By Phishing Proxies
In the future, everyone will be a billionaire for 15 minutes, until their ill-gained 15 minute life savings is phished by the next billionaire. The bank account hijack will rotate around and around, shared by everyone in the world, boosting all our credit ratings... momentarily.

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill.

Working...