Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Thus the problem with the TEA party (Score 1) 410

They don't stash it under the bed, they stick it in banks (or treasury bonds, or other low-risk investments).

The point being, it's an investment. Banks pay interest because they are loaning the money out to people who use it.

Until you can see the difference between stashing money under a bed, and putting it in a bank, you really are better off not discussing economics.

Comment Debian GNOME needs some attention (Score 3, Interesting) 403

After something like 20 years I finally found a system that won't run Debian unstable right now. My Panasonic Toughpad FZ-G1 magnesium tablet + iKey Jumpseat magnesium keyboard. Systemd and GDM break. Bought (for less than full price) because I am a frequent traveler and speaker and really do need something you can drop from 6 feet and pour coffee over have it keep working.

But because of this bug I have ubuntu at the moment, and am not having fun and am eager to return to Debian.

Comment Re:The simple fact that we can't talk about this.. (Score 1) 207

Consider for the sake of argument if everything you know about this issue is wrong. Just for the sake of argument. Now reexamine these little niche issues one at a time to see if they have anything interesting to say WHILE in that frame of mind.

This is something I do every time I get new information. I take all my opinions, convictions, and beliefs... and I put them in neutral. Then I read it all IN that frame of mind.

This is such a great idea.

Comment Re:Points of interest. (Score 2) 478

I disagree.

I know.

It is less "conspiracy theory" than it is objective analysis as it all comes from verified facts on the ground,

If you are talking about chemtrails, then once again, you're completely out there. You might as well start talking about how the moon landing was faked.

Comment Re:It is all pork barrel politics (Score 1) 342

This exact scenario has been rehashed in more than one fiction book that I've read.

By the way, you can think even further outside the box. Rich people don't just have yachts, they also have private planes. How much screening do those go through when they enter US airspace? And how devastating would an air explosion over a populated city be?

Comment Re:Points of interest. (Score 1) 478

and anonanonaon's statement does indeed make sense.

Lots of things make sense that aren't true. The question is whether it's true. The way to demonstrate something is true is by bringing evidence.

humans will go to extraordinary lengths (often unconsciously so) to keep from seeing it.

Strange how it's something only you can see.

Comment Re:Solution (Score 1) 410

Only tax based on use (i.e. Sales Tax)

A national sales tax is arguably unconstitutional.

Historically, that sort of thing has been found perfectly fine at times, and absolutely wrong at other times. Just depends on how the Supremes of the day read the law.

Which means it would probably require another Amendment to make it legal.

Comment Re:Points of interest. (Score 1) 478

He starts out fine, with points I don't want to refute, by pointing out that Obama claims he doesn't need permission from congress to go to war. OK, fine, that's true. Our constitutional scholar president really does believe that he doesn't need permission to go to war. I'm not going to try to refute that point because it's true.

Then he starts going off the rails, with this kind of thing:

Really, this is a strike at Putin for having the audacity to prevent war escalating over the Ukraine fiasco.

The US is attacking rebels in Syria because Putin prevented war in Ukraine? How does that even make sense? If you can defend that with more than vague speculation, I would be really interested in hearing it. The GP did not.

Slashdot Top Deals

Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.

Working...