Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:How do you pull over a driverless car? (Score 1) 626

Would it pull over if it sees the blinking lights / siren behind it?

Could you spoof it with a bunch of blinking xmas lights on the side of the road?

Actually a very interesting question - makes me wonder if driverless cars will have some law-enforcement override (some remote "pul over" switch) that's required for their usage.

One of the remaining systems not ready for prime time is vehicle communication systems for autonomous cars. Usually examples cited are vehicle-to-vehicle: turn signals, brake lights, etc. and infrastructure-to-vehicle: signs, traffic lights. Detecting the robot car was being pulled over by the cops would be in the former category, I suppose. Or maybe it would just be an auto-debit on the owners bank account.

Comment Re:Radical change for law enforcement (Score 1) 626

If [the police] think someone is suspicious, they look for a traffic violation as an excuse to pull them over and investigate.

That is awfully reminiscent of:

If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.

-(attributed to) Richelieu

Comment Re:Note to myself: (Score 4, Insightful) 373

Never buy a car from GM. A company that practices this type of policy can not have my confidence in any way.

All you know from TFA is that GM has a list. What you don't know is whether other automakers -- or manufacturers in general -- have similar lists. Given that all companies of any size have lawyers whose job it is to reduce potential legal liability, I'd have to assume that GM is not alone in having such a policy.

Comment Re:40 years and I still can't solve it (Score 2) 105

Then learn! RubiksPlace has one of the better tutorials on the net. Good cubes can be purchased for under $15. Buy one by Dayan, or a similar company. The official Rubik's ones mostly suck. Follow the instructions on the site and you'll have a solve within half an hour. Then you can proceed onto learning and understanding the process. It's rather fun. I've just started and my goal for this year to get a sub one minute solve. I'm busy, so if I can nail that I'll be very happy.

Having tried some, I'm willing to state that there is no tutorial in the world that would enable me to solve it, either. The cube is filed in the same folder as juggling, having a baby, and curling up my tongue -- under "stuff I just can't ever do". I tried 13 moves on the google doodle before just angrily clicking all over in frustration to see how high I could drive the counter.

Comment Re:40 years and I still can't solve it (Score 1) 105

I'm not sure, but I imagined this would make it unsolvable.

I can't solve it either, so this is pretty much PIDOOMA, but I believe that you -- WELL, not you or me, but someone -- can rotate any arbitrary piece in any arbitrary direction. So doing this does not prevent the cube from being solved. Would love to see this confirmed or denied for someone who actually knows for sure . . .

Also, if the thing is 40 years old, that means that having mine for only 34-ish years, I will never set the "longest time to solve a cube" record.

Comment Upgrade your locks (Score 1) 408

Since you've already heard about getting alarms, insurance, making backups and inventorying your electronics, computers or priceless antique cans, you might want to think about upgrading your door locks - assuming you're not renting, of course. Did you get them re-keyed when you moved in? If you're like most people, you didn't get around to it. Why not have the locksmith come out and do that and install new locks at the same time. Maybe reinforce the door jam if necessary around the deadbolt, and see if he's got other advice.

Do your windows all lock? Go outside and pretend you lost your key. Try to figure out how to get back inside.

If you make your house a little harder to break into than your neighbors', it probably won't be you that gets robbed.

Comment Re:Crapulence (Score 1) 408

If you don't know what it means, don't use it.

Remember that old Barbara Stanwyck movie where she's a streetwise singer on the lam hiding out with a bunch of nerdy lexicographers who are just coincidentally trying to add modern slang to their encyclopedia?

I don't know why I just thought of that now. Oh well. Please carry on with the lesson.

Comment K.I.S.S. (Score 1) 281

Given this info you've given us:

. . . it needs to be understandable by the non-geeks in the charity — there is no IT expertise here . . .

you need to do the simplest possible solution. And by simple, I mean one flat file you can backup and restore and one application that needs to be (re)installed would not be overkill (or is that underkill for this situation?)*. The more you have to add to that in terms of re-creating the system after a failure, the more you've set up a "dead-man" system -- where the "dead man" is you. One out-of-control cement mixer with your name on it and your system is one dead hard drive from gone. You'll know you're successful if you feel you can quit the volunteer gig without feeling guilty that the system won't be running in six months.

*That specific case may be too simple, I don't know. What I really mean is: as simple as possible without sacrificing essential features.

Comment Re:Because of cutting the cord (Score 3, Informative) 475

Thing is, Comcast is so insanely profitable they have no need to 'recoup their revenue'. They do not have some magic entitlement to such profits, esp when they get them in part by promising service levels they can not actually provide.

You know what's better than insane profits? More insane profits. And unlike data, there's no profit cap.

Slashdot Top Deals

To restore a sense of reality, I think Walt Disney should have a Hardluckland. -- Jack Paar

Working...