Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Expensive article (Score 5, Informative) 173

The article costs $15. Here is what I consider to be the relative part from the abstract, but hard to say without actually reading the article:

Based on a mixed layer temperature budget, these anomalies were caused by lower than normal rates of the loss of heat from the ocean to the atmosphere, and of relatively weak cold advection in the upper ocean. Both of these mechanisms can be attributed to an unusually strong and persistent weather pattern featuring much higher than normal sea level pressure over the waters of interest. This anomaly was the greatest observed in this region since at least the 1980s.

Comment Re:But not to Nestle. (Score 0) 332

Let's just take this at face value, and let's falsely pretend that the water shortages aren't also causing cutbacks by residential consumers. Then that's 40% of the state's water to provide a fraction of 2% of the GDP, in drought conditions.

Personally? I think you're a moron for using GDP as a valid way to allocate water resources. Seriously? Where did that idea even come from?......When a residential consumer drinks water, they are producing 0% of GDP.....You need to think a little more before responding.

Comment Re:But not to Nestle. (Score 1) 332

Agriculture is the big culprit, taking 80% of the state's water (and in return ag and mining together only make up 2% of the economy). Its a totally unsustainable situation that has to be remedied sooner or later.

That isn't true, and hasn't been true for years. Farmers are promised 80% of the state's water, but even in good years they haven't been getting that for a while. This year farmers are getting less than half the water that they've been promised.

Incidentally, the water fights between urban and rural dwellers have been going on for well over a century, and will probably continue far into the future. "Stupid farmers, taking all the water." "Stupid city slickers, what are they going to eat?"

Comment Re:But not to Nestle. (Score 3, Interesting) 332

California residents use about 1 trillion gallons a year (about 10% of California's yearly water usage). To put that into perspective: almond farms use about 1.2 trillion gallons a year; alfalfa farms use about 1.5 trillion gallons a year.

Not the past few years......farmers have been getting 50% (or less) of their normal amount of water. This year, for example, an almond farmer near Manteca who is used to getting 48 inches a year will be lucky to get 18 inches.

Comment Re:Everyone loves taxes (Score 1) 173

Sure, sure it is popular to claim that the government wastes money It goes back to the Proxmire Golden Fleece Awards where a Senator from Wisconsin would claim to have identified horrendous wastes of money,

It's way older than that. In the early 1800s people were complaining that government was wasting money on canal infrastructure projects, digging canals so shipping could travel across the US. People complained that the canals could have been dug much more cheaply by the private sector.

Most of the arguments we have in politics go back all the way to the beginning in one form or another. It's kind of amazing.

Comment Re:better idea (Score 0, Troll) 166

Western Europe has always been on the forefront of civilization, no?

No. Through most of history, Western Europe has been a wasteland of culture......starting around a thousand years BC, a small corner of the region (Greece) started getting some culture, but the rest was still a garbage heap of warring tribes, mainly until the Renaissance.

Of course, then Europe made a fairly tremendous leap forward, but that was relatively recent in historical terms.

Slashdot Top Deals

The question of whether computers can think is just like the question of whether submarines can swim. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

Working...