The article takes that data into consideration. Clearly you didn't read it, and me repeating it won't help you.

It's not the only paper. If you pay attention to scientific consensus, it's become clear that the models are wrong, and scientists are trying to explain why.

Oh Layzej, is there anything that would cause you to have an open mind on global warming? What would convince you that it isn't really an issue? Or are you going to have true faith until the end?

This post is hilarious +5

Sure, I have. Once again, Christy is the kind of scientist who literally goes out into the field to collect data. He follows the data, and is willing to change his opinion if the data changes.

What about you? Are you willing to keep an open mind when it is shown that the models over-estimate global warming? Or will you continue to try to slander scientists who disagree with you as AIDS deniers?

Well, I didn't expect actual studies in actual journals to sway your opinion.

According to this story, the thing 'scientists' do is try to get the press to label anyone who disagrees with them as 'deniers.'

Meanwhile real scientists have determined there's no imminent danger from climate change. Once again though, I expect you are too far committed to your opinion to let facts change it.

Yeah, I'll take an article from Nature over your crappy wordpress site.

Anyway, we agree on what should be done in Cuba, so the rest doesn't really matter.

The consensus from scientists who build models is 'not dangerous. And it IS noteworthy that the models are known to over-estimate the effects of CO2.

If you're going to choose which scientist to 'believe,' then believe the ones who actually collect data, like John Christy. He wanted to know if the AGW hypothesis was correct, so what did he do? He went out and created a dataset from California's central valley, to compare temperatures in settled areas to non-settled areas. He wondered about the accuracy of the global temperature record, so what did he do? He created an alternate way of measuring temperature using satellites. He went to Africa to create datasets, to measure and see what is really happening, while other scientists were creating models (which we now know were inaccurate).

That is how you do science, by collecting data to verify or disprove your hypothesis. You don't beg the press to demonize people you don't like, that's not science.

You should really provide citations for this kind of thing.

And the result is that for decades we've overestimated the effect of CO2 and that all the computer models are wrong. If you deny that after the multiple studies have shown it, then you're the denier.

Yeah, if only there were a well-funded organization sponsored by the UN that's spent three decades doing proper analysis of the problem.
I guess we don't have that so we can't propose proper solutions. Oh well.

Sure enough, they have National Hot Dog day, where they serve veggie hot dogs in Washington wearing bikinis.

How would Sony be liable for that? Do they have some kind of responsibility to secure the theaters they do not own?

So.....apparently you think it makes sense, when evaluating the Cuban economy, to ignore an important source of revenue.