Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"UN Says: Why Not Eat More Insects?" (Score 2) 626

I have seen a lot of things about eating insects, but there are two things to add.

Some insects just taste like dirt or earth or mould. I once bit into a plum which was infested with larvae, and it really tasted horrific. Escargots are tasty because they are fed on grape leaves, but normal snails also taste like dirt (my father in law once accidentally ate one on a strawberry).

Second, keratin is not digestible, and the smaller the insect, the more keratin it contains versus digestible parts. What is crunchy in some insects is just shell.

There is no doubt that grasshoppers contain enough protein to e.g. stop kwashiorkor.

I think the world would be better suited with learning people that they do not need to eat so much meat. Meat should rise in price, less meat should be produced over all. This would have two effects: more people could live by producing meat, because they would not need to raise as much animals. The health of people would also rise, because of consuming less meat.

Comment Random predictions are maybe even better (Score 4, Interesting) 290

A magazine here in Belgium (Humo) did a couple of years ago an experiment about the stock market to see what recommendations of experts were worth.

They had a team of chimpanzees and a team of experts. The results were that the chimpanzees did better than the experts.

Since the chimpanzees can probably be considered a very good random number generator, it seems that it would also probably be better to use random predictions.

Or, as Roger Von Oech would say, "Consult an Oracle".

Slashdot Top Deals

"You know, we've won awards for this crap." -- David Letterman

Working...