You find online what is not only supported, but also rather nice for the price. You might then buy online
The problem with buying computer hardware online is the cost of shipping it back if you need to return it. And with manufacturers cutting costs by making silent changes to the chipset (e.g. from Atheros to Broadcom) within a model number, it is more likely than not that eventually you will need to return something.
or, if you really want to, go to local shop.
The problem with buying computer hardware in a local shop is that they likely do not carry the model you picked out when you browsed the HCL.
You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird.
Yeah ditto on that weirdness vibe. Kind of makes one wonder how they handle something like America's Sex Offender registry.
You'll get websites saying you need to download this codec to watch this video, and people will do it. With a standard codec, if a site does that, users can be educated that they shouldn't download ANY codec.
Even if delvers better sound and video? Significantly improved compression?
Closed captioning, secfond channel audio or other benefits?
Tell me why the geek thinks the web should be permenently bound to whatever codec he - and perhaps he alone - thinks is "technologically superior" or "politically correct."
Why there should be no competition, no room for experiment.
Stability (by definition) is the antithesis to the IT industry.
Baloney. Eventually the Moore's law gravy train that's been responsible for a lot of the continued development and the rapid change will be over. When that will happen I don't know, but it will. Much of the innovations of new languages has been at least in part been a result of Moore's law. Sure, the change and innovation will likely never stop, but it will slow. Even farming has innovation and change in it and it's one of the oldest activities we have.
Think I'm wrong? Imagine what the world would be like if Moore's law stopped 20 years ago with the transistor count of the 486. That will herald a different era, likely geared towards doing more with the same amount of stuff.
I am pretty sure if you take the top 10 schools in spending per pupil the majority will be among the bottom 10 schools as far as actually educating students goes.*
And I'm pretty sure you'd be dead wrong.*
The top public schools in the Chicago area are in some of the wealthiest suburbs, and they spend a lot of money per student.
*citation needed
I am still trying to picture a spiritual game.
"Do androids dream of electric sheep" had an electronic game that was pretty well what you describe, except as unseen enemies threw rocks at you as you climbed the mountain you just had to grit your teeth and bear it.
I think you'll find that what's actually occurred here is that just as a "dwarf planet" is technically not a planet, an "extra-solar planet" also doesn't fit the definition and therefore also isn't technically a planet.
A good definition makes things clearer. This definition clearly fails by that criteria.
Also my point about clearing the orbit was more about the formation of the planet. Even with a solid body formed and most of it's mass present, if it's still part of the solar disk and still subject to bombardment it is not a planet. What the hell it is during the early part of solar disk evolution isn't clear.
Which is why any decent sql language/database interface will throw an exception if a query fails.
Oh and is MySQL the only database that just let the query hang until there is free diskspace again?
In the sciences, we are now uniquely priviledged to sit side by side with the giants on whose shoulders we stand. -- Gerald Holton