[
Disclaimer: To be perfectly honest, I've
never actually read the
Spider-Man comics. But the story has become a part of the American Lexicon, and I saw
every episode of the cartoon that Fox ran on Saturday mornings a few years back (the theme still in my head as I walked into the theater). Just thought I should be up-front about it.]
Just saw
Spider-Man tonight (left the theater only a half-hour ago, in fact), and I must say, it is a
great movie.
Spider-Man done right. What impresses me most is that now, shortly after seeing the movie, I remember the plot more than the action sequences. That's not to say the action wasn't good, because it was
very good. But it didn't dominate. It didn't carry the film. The story could do that on its own. OK, I admit, part of the reason the plot stands out in my mind more than the action is because I already knew the first half of the movie. But here's the real point: I didn't walk out of the theater with the action scenes in my mind. I walked out thinking: "
They got it right ." That's what impressed me the most.
Toby Maguire was perfect in the role as Peter Parker, and equally up to the task as the webslinger himself. He captures the surprise as he discovers his powers; Peter's love for Mary Jane (the girl, not the drug), and the smart-ass nature of Spider-Man perfectly.
The sequence where he's mastering his powers is cool, especially his first awkward websling. The sequence in which Uncle Ben is killed (before and after) is done perfectly, including that first awkward websling. The "under-appreciated hero" angle is played just right, beginning to end.
Another thought: Although admittedly I haven't been to the theaters much lately, I'd venture to say that this is the first film to use
The Matrix-style slowdowns right (since
The Matrix, naturally, and not in parody). It was perfect for showing off his "Spider-Sense," allowing you to get a sense of that ultra-fast reaction time.
There were a couple of times during the movie that Superman came to mind. One, of course, was intrinsic to the story: the death of Ben Parker. I couldn't help but think back to the death of Clark's father in
Superman. The whole "death of a loved one turned inspiration" angle. In
Spider-Man it was an essential part of the character and the comic, in
Superman it was thrown in for dramatic effect (Never read
Superman, either, but the movie was the only adaptation I'd seen where his father died). The other thing was the way the plot was laid out. Couldn't be helped, in both cases, the back-story had to be handled first. In both films, the costumed hero didn't show up into halfway through, and then they dealt with the villain. Speaking of
Superman comparisons, Maguire was better suited to the "regular guy" roles than Christopher Reeve. Reeve made for an awfully big and chiseled nerd. As Superman, he was perfectly suited. Maguire provided a better balance (helped by the fact that Spidey wears a
mask).
To sum it up: I loved the movie, want to see it again,
will buy it on DVD, am already looking forward to a sequel, and will probably start buying the comics.
Random theater thoughts:
- My one problem with the movie: Sitting in a theater seat for two hours. My ass always gets sore in those seats, without fail. Oh, well, the movie was good enough that I didn't really care until it was time to get up anyway.
- I mentioned in my Ramblings of an Idiot (3rd Installment) (scroll down, asshole, you don't need a link) that I didn't want to see anything that had to do with Star Wars: Episode II: Attack of the Clones before seeing the actual movie. Well, unfortunately a trailer for Episode II played before Spider-Man. Suddenly became harder to avoid. Anyway, it looks like it's gonna kick ass. It looks like it will have that darker edge to it, more like Star Wars: Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. Plus action and Jedis up the wazoo (Not a good place to store your Jedis, is it?).
- I've never seen a movie in the theater more than once (like I said in RoaI(3I), I don't go much at all), but this movie is good enough that I want to go back. I thought I would feel like this three years ago when Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace was released. I didn't. It wasn't worth paying the admission price twice. I knew I'd watch it again, but not in a theater. I'm gonna see Spider-Man in the theater again.
- The theater I went to misprinted the tickets. The ticket said "Spider-Man 3", meaning on screen three. It was for the 5:30 show. I walked in at 5:15, and immediately noticed that this showing was already in progress. I left, noticed the times posted outside the door, and realized it should have said "Spider-Man 1", because the 5:30 showing was there, on screen one. Luckily, the mix-up didn't spoil anything for me (I didn't see or hear enough).
- The theater was only half full today. Just goes to show you. Don't go opening day. Go opening day + three.
- $4.75 ticket. I love matinees.
- Hulk: Summer, 2003. Suddenly seems like I'm going to be going to the theater more.
Well, that's all I really have to say. In case anyone who hasn't seen the movie is reading this (about the same chance as Bill Gates releasing the Longhorn source code under the GPL), I avoided spoilers. This is a review; not a summary.
Goodnight!
--Pagsz, World's Smartest Moron