You're still defending Twitter and Facebook preventing voters from communicating information that's bad for Facebook and Twitter's politician. You should stop defending it. It's not magically ok just because there are a few other communication mechanisms that aren't censored.

Democracy requires open communication. Facebook and Twitter decided they exclusively allow communication only when it benefits their chosen politician. You should stop defending their anti-democratic censorship.

You guys really have a weird hangup on Fox news. I bet you think someone wants to defend Fox news. Instead, no one gives a shit and you look like a fool.

So you're 100% onboard with major corporations preventing communication among voters on specific topics a few weeks before an election? When Google and Facebook and Twitter get together to decide what info voters shouldn't see, you're going to be cheering them on?

I'd like to have a real democracy with real democratic elections instead of elections decided by 3 or 4 communication corporations' filtering out info that's bad for their chosen candidate.

You might have looked at disinformation in VR. Be happy that your now non-functional VR headset doesn't show you disinformation.

Coverups that don't work aren't wrong. Cool. Nixon is off the hook.

I said they tried to hide it or attempted to hide it, not that they successfully hid it so that no one could ever find it. You should stop playing defense for them attempting to hide information from voters. Do you support the Communist Chinese Party attempting to censor because they only hide information from some people? Do you defend it this way?

They are preventing people from communicating this information. That's undisputed.

You should stop playing defense for Facebook and Twitter attempting to hide information from voters before an election.

Refute with facts instead of censoring.

Instead of playing defense, you should be against censorship. Hiding information from voters right before an election is anti-democratic.

True or false is not related to the size of the paper the information is printed on.

Biden isn't even denying it any more. Now he's saying it might have happened.

And? The size of the paper they print on matters because...?

Twitter says the info is from a "hack". Are you saying the info is fabricated and not from a hack? Which is it?

"Tabloid" is just name-calling. Name-calling is for when you can't argue facts. Get some facts.

Facebook and Twitter shouldn't get to decide what news reporting voters are allowed to see.

Facebook and Twitter weren’t standing next to Biden that day when he met with the Ukrainians or didn't meet with the Ukrainians. We’re you standing there? I don't think you were.

If the info is false, refute it with facts. Hiding info is anti-democratic.

I kept waiting for Cere to be an imperial double agent, finding all the Jedi and training them up. Then the empire would just capture them and turn them and they'd become the next generation of imperial inquisitors or whatever. Why would the empire want to eliminate the Jedi when that's the empire's source of all the powerful imperial people?