Comment Re:First blacks, (Score 1) 917
What if a black couple doesn't want to hire a white supremacist wedding photographer?
What if a black couple doesn't want to hire a white supremacist wedding photographer?
No one "asked" for a public business license. The local government warlord sends armed men to wreck your shop and take you to prison if you don't bend a knee and pay for one of their business licenses.
"is it okay for the state to tell someone who they must do business with? "
Yes. When a group is in a position they can't get services, and goods.
Because the world will spin off its axis if the government doesn't force people to bake wedding cakes against their will? Instead of sending in the wedding cake police, how about just buy a wedding cake from someone who wants to make you a wedding cake?
Government should force people to bake wedding cakes against their will because
It's because we allow freedom of speech.
This really is dangerous, as speech I disagree with should be contained and eliminated from society.
Free speech serves no positive purpose, and only works to hinder the good that government itself does in socialization.
etc.
Not forcing people to make wedding cakes against their will is "hatred" now?
But it's a 2-3 year advantage. And the future has more years than that.
In the the past and present, battery life, software compatibility, and customer-friendly licensing terms are what matter most.
Also, Intel needs to make chips designed to help customers, not chips designed to help Intel. "We need you to buy these chips so Intel is no longer frozen out of the mobile device market" isn't what customers are interested in hearing.
People who steal phones are great phone service customers and always pay their bills on time.
If you like your smartphone, you can keep your smartphone. Period.
If we do not fight back...
Against free speech? By making completely baseless accusations? Rather than "fight back", why not try to make a fact-based argument?
His unsubstantiated claim was in reply to another unsubstantiated claim. And now your reply is an ad hominem, claiming people are getting paid for "shilling" on this thread.
Why are these discussions always so plagued with shallow fanboys?
None. They didn't produce anything or work to earn their money at all. They inherited it.
How many of them predicted zero warming between 1998 and 2013?
The temperature data doesn't have a motive.
It's pretty easy to "predict" temperature trends in years that have already gone by.
To understand a program you must become both the machine and the program.
